It is amusing though when you get the latest emails from the IT Job Board and one role has the words in its description:
In other words either
a ) This job doesnt exist and I am blatantly fishing for leads or
b ) This job does exist and I am still blatantly fishing for leads - if you dont give me a lead I wont put you forward.
The words "bargepole, stick" came to my mind as I dump the mail in the wastebin. Oh and it was an agency that comes up on here very often (<coughs>regressive<coughs>), who I wont touch with a stick or bargepole anyhow.
Candidates with evidence of their successes in development, in terms of testimonials or references, will be considered ahead of others
a ) This job doesnt exist and I am blatantly fishing for leads or
b ) This job does exist and I am still blatantly fishing for leads - if you dont give me a lead I wont put you forward.
The words "bargepole, stick" came to my mind as I dump the mail in the wastebin. Oh and it was an agency that comes up on here very often (<coughs>regressive<coughs>), who I wont touch with a stick or bargepole anyhow.

) complete boll**ks. New Cvs with fresh references are much easier to exploit than trawling through databases looking for names. Putting the words "test manager" does not give you a list of line managers who have actively recruited in the last year. Such a search gives you people with "test" and "manager" on their CVs which is entirely different. The consultant then, having run the search has to sort out the line managers from those that once "managed to pull a bird" or "managed to get out of bed on time". Once that task has been completed it is then highly likely that the CVs are 2-200 years out of date and the "manager" is elsewhere.
underhandedness
Comment