Originally posted by Paralytic
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
New gig - Agencies arguing again
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostTo be fair I thought this thread would more along the lines of he's applied to two agents, both have found out who he is and both are trying to wash their hands of him. You have him, no you have him...

Comment
-
PC ... learn from this ... in future, put it in writing. It's that simple. Just ping an email to the agency, responding to the email where they sent you the job spec etc, and say that you do not give them permission to represent you.
Even if agency 1 hadn't entered you on the system correctly (or more likely just not got around to it), it doesn't give agency 2 the right to steal you when you have not given them permission.
Maybe change agencies you use too ... they sound dodgy.
I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostTo be fair I thought this thread would more along the lines of he's applied to two agents, both have found out who he is and both are trying to wash their hands of him. You have him, no you have him...
And I thought this thread wasn't going to be worth reading...
Comment
-
Tip for you. Check the poster. You would have had your answer thereOriginally posted by jamesbrown View Post]And I thought this thread wasn't going to be worth reading...
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
See what you mean and, to be honest, most agencies are very keen on this representation email these days. For some reason, agency 1 forgot to do it.Originally posted by Whorty View PostPC ... learn from this ... in future, put it in writing. It's that simple. Just ping an email to the agency, responding to the email where they sent you the job spec etc, and say that you do not give them permission to represent you.
Even if agency 1 hadn't entered you on the system correctly (or more likely just not got around to it), it doesn't give agency 2 the right to steal you when you have not given them permission.
Maybe change agencies you use too ... they sound dodgy.
I do try to be a bit flexible with agents. I'm sure we've all had the "yes I'll submit you to client" then find out they didn't so in this case if agency 2 want to tag along then thats fine by me.
Some very dodgy stealing attempted by agency 2 here though - bit off indeed.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
But it's your attitude that allowed this to happen ... being fine agency 2 tag along is never fine if you have agreed with agency 1 that they can represent you.Originally posted by psychocandy View Post
See what you mean and, to be honest, most agencies are very keen on this representation email these days. For some reason, agency 1 forgot to do it.
I do try to be a bit flexible with agents. I'm sure we've all had the "yes I'll submit you to client" then find out they didn't so in this case if agency 2 want to tag along then thats fine by me.
Some very dodgy stealing attempted by agency 2 here though - bit off indeed.
So yes, agency 2 dodgy, but sounds like you're happy them being dodgy if it gets you a job. Work ethically yourself, and work with ethical agencies, and these issues will never crop up.I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter man
Comment
-
Ah you misunderstand.... Agency 2 asked me and I said "I've already been submitted". They then asked me for the job ref which I got off agency 1. They said "ah ok".Originally posted by Whorty View Post
But it's your attitude that allowed this to happen ... being fine agency 2 tag along is never fine if you have agreed with agency 1 that they can represent you.
So yes, agency 2 dodgy, but sounds like you're happy them being dodgy if it gets you a job. Work ethically yourself, and work with ethical agencies, and these issues will never crop up.
Didn't hear from them, didn't give them permission until this.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Tell agency number 1 that you have to use agency 2.
Tell agency number 2 that you have to use agency 1.
Go direct.
Comment
-
Yeah, that'll work....Originally posted by hugebrain View PostTell agency number 1 that you have to use agency 2.
Tell agency number 2 that you have to use agency 1.
Go direct.
Blog? What blog...?
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment