Originally posted by dsc
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
How can we fight back against Infosys, TCS and other Indian consultancies?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Why agents keep pushing perm roles then? Most calls I get is for perm and agents try to make me change my mind talking about various perks or stability I would get. -
Because agents are looking for ANYBODY who’s CV might fit the bill.Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostWhy agents keep pushing perm roles then? Most calls I get is for perm and agents try to make me change my mind talking about various perks or stability I would get.
And permies aren’t moving anywhere right now unless they’re really dumb.
So the only people on the job market are failed/failing/benched contractors.See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostUmbrellas provide a function (payroll) that agencies don't want to perform and have a habit of screwing up...Payroll is a complicated business process. Most companies outsource it because there are so many constantly changing rules and regulations. I don't think you'll find many accountancy firms can or would want to manage a large payroll operation.Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostIsn't it what accountants are for? It seems like a little bit of a stretch...
A) "We just can't run payroll as our accounting keeps screwing up, it's sooo difficult. They literally cannot do maths. Let's have an external company to deal with the payroll. What do you mean they will take our employees?"
B) "We cannot have a risk of our employees forming an union and worry about sick pay, maternity leave and other crap and we still cannot get rid of Steve. How can we avoid that? Let's have an external company to deal with employees! No longer our problem! What do you mean we won't need to run payroll as well? You're genius!"Comment
-
That doesn't explain why this has to involve avoiding responsibility for workers' rights.Originally posted by edison View PostPayroll is a complicated business process. Most companies outsource it because there are so many constantly changing rules and regulations. I don't think you'll find many accountancy firms can or would want to manage a large payroll operation.Comment
-
I am not a libertarian, but a free market without too much regulation should fix this problem by itself.Comment
-
Free market rewards people who deserve being rewarded for taking the risk and their hard work, and unfortunately lately regulation is not used to make the market safe from bad actors, but rather to divert profits to people who don't deserve it, for example party donors or those in the circle.Originally posted by candy View PostI am not a libertarian, but a free market without too much regulation should fix this problem by itself.Comment
-
Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostFree market rewards people who deserve being rewarded for taking the risk and their hard work...
Working for the same company and doing the same job for 2 years. That’s not taking a risk. That’s being an employee.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Would you explain how you worked out the 2 years threshold?Originally posted by WTFH View PostWorking for the same company and doing the same job for 2 years. That’s not taking a risk. That’s being an employee.
If you have been going to the same hairdresser for 2 years, should you have him or her on your payroll?Comment
-
At least give him an example that's not ridiculous and makes you look a bit daft.Originally posted by elsergiovolador View PostWould you explain how you worked out the 2 years threshold?
If you have been going to the same hairdresser for 2 years, should you have him or her on your payroll?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
The tax is only half the issue with being inside for many. Being unable to claim T&S is equally massive as hotel bills and train fares/mileage suddenly have to come out of take home pay instead of ltd top line.
That has a triple whammy of impacting how much you have to take out of the company and will definitely push you into top bracket tax take, whether that be down the dividend tax or PAYE tax route.
FTCs could be a reasonable middle ground on that, where if you get a four-week notice period, it actually has to be paid up if they let you go.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment