• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

State of the Market

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Is recruiting part of your contract? If not, you are SO FAR inside IR35…
    Chill, I just passed on a few contacts as a friendly favour.

    Comment


      If anyone is interested. Sounds legit…
      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2194.jpeg
Views:	631
Size:	156.9 KB
ID:	4296998

      Comment


        Originally posted by edison View Post

        SNIP

        The FT did an interesting analysis comparing several economies and what effect excluding the richest region would have on GDP per capita. The comparatively outsized dominance of London was startling. The rest of the UK has an average GDP per capita lower than almost every single US state, just on a par with Mississippi. Which illustrates why so much of the UK’s economic prospects seem bleak.
        The article you mention may contain a different methodology. In the way you have described small areas cannot be compared for GDP per capita for many reasons. I assume you haven't explained the methodology correctly.

        Comment


          Originally posted by willendure View Post
          [...]Its really about shedding some of the work force without having to resort to explicit layoffs - some people will not like it and will voluntarily leave. Those that stay, will be the ones most committed.[...]
          Anyone with half a brain would carry on coming to the office considering how bad the job market is.

          Comment


            Originally posted by willendure View Post

            Consider the recent announcement by Amazon that all workers are to return to the office full time. Is it really because they think that improves productivity? Studies have shown that flexible working is good for productivity. Its really about shedding some of the work force without having to resort to explicit layoffs - some people will not like it and will voluntarily leave. Those that stay, will be the ones most committed.
            Indeed. Amazon employees, some of them, will quit or find new roles. But will they find it easy to jump ship, especially in a heavyly landen restrictive permanent job market? AFAIR Amazon UK rarely hires contractors, but they may take on niche consultants.

            This is unsurprising to me as Apple has / had a return-to-the-office full time policy for awhie. I agree it is a power move, because they think that the "great resignation" (USA phenomenon 2021/2022) is well and truly over. Will other lesser famed businesses follow suit? Well probably not., because a good CEO would hold off any such plans for a 1 or 2 years. "Hey Amazon Person. Come and work for us! We are flexible." There will be Hot Talent, but whether these lesser business can cope with the wage demands of the exiters will be another matter.

            Comment


              Originally posted by edison View Post
              The FT did an interesting analysis comparing several economies and what effect excluding the richest region would have on GDP per capita. The comparatively outsized dominance of London was startling. The rest of the UK has an average GDP per capita lower than almost every single US state, just on a par with Mississippi. Which illustrates why so much of the UK’s economic prospects seem bleak.
              The UK economy is incredibly imbalanced geographically when compared to comparable developed western economies.

              We have one huge economic centre in a mega-city, and the rest of it is just a few cities a fraction the size of London and a lot of (relatively) low value industries spread across a large hinterland.

              Even the breadth of infrastructure across greater London is miles ahead of what exists in the rest of the country.

              I'd hoped the Tories would move the seat of government to the midlands or the north, and turn Westminster and the HoL into tourist attractions, but sadly that never materialised. There's no chance of Labour ever going down that road.

              I think the move towards remote and hybrid working since COVID has improved the imbalance somewhat, but that's just a subjective observation based on the changes I can see in the NW region that I live in.

              Comment


                Originally posted by sreed View Post

                I'd hoped the Tories would move the seat of government to the midlands or the north, and turn Westminster and the HoL into tourist attractions, but sadly that never materialised. There's no chance of Labour ever going down that road.
                .
                Why on earth did you think the Tories would do that?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by SpliterOfLogs View Post
                  Why on earth did you think the Tories would do that?
                  I’m not entirely sure but I think I remember them talking about relocating Parliament out of London quite a few times, when all that discussion was going on about about the ultra expensive repair and maintenance bills to keep the current buildings operational, and back when there was a lot of hand wringing about how most of the HoC’s legislation only applies to England.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by SpliterOfLogs View Post

                    Why on earth did you think the Tories would do that?
                    Because the bill to repair Parliament is estimated to be between £2 and £5bn pounds.

                    Personally I've argued it should move to Bradford because that would result in both HS2 and NPR being built instantly...
                    merely at clientco for the entertainment

                    Comment


                      There's precedent for the "seat of power" to not be where the major economic or tourist activity happens. The Palace of Westminster is falling apart and instead of being sensible about moving out to another location to allow repairs, successive parliaments (both chambers) have just stalled and nit picked over their own self-interests. The bill gets higher with every passing year they delay doing anything substantive about it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X