On what basis can an agent be sacked?

[TykeMerc]

No the real cynic is those like me who believe none of this stuff and just think-

this boat has sailed, time to find another contract...

Think the FaQQer is implying that I don't actually believe a word of the OP's story and spam posting in this thread because it follows the typical blueprint of a certain type of sockpuppet acct. I of course would never make that claim since I was told off by the CUK authorities for pointing it out in the past.

[northernladuk]

Haven't we had similar tales of woe where the OP wants to set right numerous perceived wrongs from agents? I've a feeling that they proved to be less than truthful.
.

I was thinking this. We've had two threads where the OP asks what to do about agents actions and then flogs a dead horse through the whole thread despite everyone saying the same thing.

You've had our thoughts, you've got some possible actions, you don't agree with us so just get on with whatever you want. We aren't interested anymore.

[tractor]

...

I was thinking this. We've had two threads where the OP asks what to do about agents actions and then flogs a dead horse through the whole thread despite everyone saying the same thing.

You've had our thoughts, you've got some possible actions, you don't agree with us so just get on with whatever you want. We aren't interested anymore.

I am I wanna know what OP cannot provide them with. I suspect that will explain the whole matter and that is why they are being so coy about it.

[SpontaneousOrder]

FrankBigBird.

[SueEllen]

FrankBigBird.

Is this why this thread is crazy?

You knowing sacking an agent is pointless. It doesn't stop them turning up somewhere else.

[eek]

I am I wanna know what OP cannot provide them with. I suspect that will explain the whole matter and that is why they are being so coy about it.

3 months on remand you mean....

[cojak]

The matter is several steps ahead of what's being posted here.

You may find yourself without the means of posting however...