Brexiters - you lost, get over it.

[Zigenare]

The problem is really that you have a low IQ. It's not an ad hominem attack, just an obvious fact.

I feel no need to ridicule those that have voted differently to me.

[sasguru]

I feel no need to ridicule those that have voted differently to me.

I deleted that post because I felt ashamed of it. But on reflection, I think its true.
Because sometimes you have to riducle people who are refuse to see or analyse the facts.
I suspect a second referendum is coming - I'll be disappointed because I think a hard Brexit is the only way for people to see sense - then we can have a second ref.

[Zigenare]

I deleted that post because I felt ashamed of it. But on reflection, I think its true.
Because sometimes you have to riducle people who are refuse to see or analyse the facts.
I suspect a second referendum is coming - I'll be disappointed because I think a hard Brexit is the only way for people to see sense - then we can have a second ref.

I feel no need to ridicule those that have voted differently to me.

[shaunbhoy]

.
Because sometimes you have to riducle people

Oh Dear.......sas has had too many sniffs of the barmaid's apron again!!

[NotAllThere]

I feel no need to ridicule those that have voted differently to me.

Yeah - you just do it for fun, same as us.

[Cirrus]

FTFY

I put all my savings and pension into Bitcoin because I felt I just wasn't rich enough right now. I wanted to grasp the opportunity to get unbelievable amounts of unearned wealth and create my and my son's future.

If it looks too good to be true, it probably is.

Gamblers Anonymous UK

[meridian]

I voted to leave because I felt that the status quo wasn't the way forward. I wanted to grasp the opportunity to shake things up and create my and my son's future.

I'm not gambling, I'm bloody sure that if we pull together we can create a better environment for us and our children than the EU Super state is offering.

At the risk of sounding repetitive, what is it that you want to do that you couldn’t do inside the EU?

Are you getting a group together so we can “pull together and create a better environment”? What does this better environment look like, so that we know we’re all pulling in the same direction?

[original PM]

At the risk of sounding repetitive, what is it that you want to do that you couldn’t do inside the EU?

Are you getting a group together so we can “pull together and create a better environment”? What does this better environment look like, so that we know we’re all pulling in the same direction?

I imagine this is just the thin end of the wedge.

What is Article 13 and Article 11? The EU'''s "meme ban" copyright plan explained | WIRED UK

and I seriously recommend you watch the video from youtbe

[WTFH]

I imagine this is just the thin end of the wedge.

What is Article 13 and Article 11? The EU'''s "meme ban" copyright plan explained | WIRED UK

and I seriously recommend you watch the video from youtbe

Are you saying that stopping the theft of copyrighted material is a bad thing?

That video is actually a good example of a carefully scripted piece that is supposed to sound like it gives all the facts, but doesn't. It starts off with the scare story "We may have to block Youtube in your country".

Well, no. Where copyrighted material has been stolen without the copyright owner's permission, then why do you have a problem with it being refused?

If someone creates/owns a piece of media, it only takes a couple of seconds to apply a creative commons copyright to it... When we share, everyone wins - Creative Commons
Any artist knows that.

When he talks about "creators" who use other material - like putting up a video and using music recorded by a band, he's talking about the theft of copyrighted material. Snowflakes don't like that term, they say that it is increasing the exposure of the artist - no it isn't. It's associating the artist with the thief's brand. When he their monetises his video, how much of it does he give to the artist?

[original PM]

Are you saying that stopping the theft of copyrighted material is a bad thing?

That video is actually a good example of a carefully scripted piece that is supposed to sound like it gives all the facts, but doesn't. It starts off with the scare story "We may have to block Youtube in your country".

Well, no. Where copyrighted material has been stolen without the copyright owner's permission, then why do you have a problem with it being refused?

If someone creates/owns a piece of media, it only takes a couple of seconds to apply a creative commons copyright to it... When we share, everyone wins - Creative Commons
Any artist knows that.

When he talks about "creators" who use other material - like putting up a video and using music recorded by a band, he's talking about the theft of copyrighted material. Snowflakes don't like that term, they say that it is increasing the exposure of the artist - no it isn't. It's associating the artist with the thief's brand. When he their monetises his video, how much of it does he give to the artist?

So any mash up will be blocked

such as this

Or do you enjoy your game reviews on YouTube?

edit can only post one video link.

Nope that will be gone as well because it is youtube who are responsible - in fact because I have posted these videos here CUK will be responsible.

And so no body is going to put anything online for fear of breaching copyright

And so the only channels you will get are the official ones run by the government which will be telling you what they want you to believe, what they want you to think and what you are allowed to do.

Brexit may not make everything better tomorrow but it is better than the future offered by the EU.