Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What does Brexit mean for me?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Perhaps, but the point needs to be rammed home. Over and over again. A lot of what Brexiteers were complaining about, and voting to escape from, has been caused by the abject failure of the UK and not the EU.Originally posted by woohoo View PostI guarantee that most intelligent people can understand your point without resorting to gear box analogies.
This may seem irrelevant - water under the bridge. Brexiteers won't suddenly have a Damascene moment and see the light. However if you are trying to guess what will happen post-Brexit, don't count on any wonderful new firework trade deals. Britain will be tainted goods being tossed around in a big vicious world run by hopeless, Woman's Institute bureaucrats with nothing much to offer apart from world class money laundering and tax evasion. The shelf life of that commodity is very questionable."Don't part with your illusions; when they are gone you may still exist, but you have ceased to live" Mark TwainComment
-
In all seriousness, do you suffer from depression? I'm not making fun, I think depression is a serious illness. But you seem to have a bleak and negative view of the world.Originally posted by Cirrus View PostPerhaps, but the point needs to be rammed home. Over and over again. A lot of what Brexiteers were complaining about, and voting to escape from, has been caused by the abject failure of the UK and not the EU.
This may seem irrelevant - water under the bridge. Brexiteers won't suddenly have a Damascene moment and see the light. However if you are trying to guess what will happen post-Brexit, don't count on any wonderful new firework trade deals. Britain will be tainted goods being tossed around in a big vicious world run by hopeless, Woman's Institute bureaucrats with nothing much to offer apart from world class money laundering and tax evasion. The shelf life of that commodity is very questionable.Comment
-
Please show me this evidence that you talk about in relation to Britain. I would like to look at the source of the evidence so I can understand the motives behind the research.Originally posted by meridian View PostThis has been thoroughly debunked in relation to developing nations. Although there are notional tariffs on food from Africa, for example, under the EBA scheme the effective tariff is 0%. The only way that green beans in Tescos from Kenya can be cheaper is if we increase development aid, and that is a UK decision not an EU one.Comment
-
You want evidence so that you can understand the motives behind the research?Originally posted by woohoo View PostI would like to look at the source of the evidence so I can understand the motives behind the research.
Not "so that you can learn something you didn't know", but so you can find out why they researched it?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
It's called bias. For example, if you are a company and want to produce evidence that backs up your agenda, you pay the right company to produce that research.Originally posted by WTFH View PostYou want evidence so that you can understand the motives behind the research?
Not "so that you can learn something you didn't know", but so you can find out why they researched it?
So, if I want to understand the claim that something has been debunked, then I want to see the evidence so I can evaluate it. Part of that evaluation is understanding who is paying for that evidence and their motives.Comment
-
Correct, like 5 rich tax exiles and the Brexit supporting pressOriginally posted by woohoo View PostIt's called bias. For example, if you are a company and want to produce evidence that backs up your agenda, you pay the right company to produce that research.
So, if I want to understand the claim that something has been debunked, then I want to see the evidence so I can evaluate it. Part of that evaluation is understanding who is paying for that evidence and their motives.
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
This is so, so true...Now Brexit is the overwhelming topic in the government and so those problems that already existed are being put on the back burner and getting worse.Originally posted by Cirrus View PostPerhaps, but the point needs to be rammed home. Over and over again. A lot of what Brexiteers were complaining about, and voting to escape from, has been caused by the abject failure of the UK and not the EU.“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
What does Brexit mean for me?
There’s no motives, and it’s not research, it’s the Everything But Arms scheme and is applied by the EU (of which the U.K. is currently a participating member)Originally posted by woohoo View PostPlease show me this evidence that you talk about in relation to Britain. I would like to look at the source of the evidence so I can understand the motives behind the research.
Try this link for the source of the scheme:
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/tradehelp/everything-arms
And here’s the Generalised System of Preferences:
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/cou...f-preferences/
For a wider explanation of the various schemes including EBA, try this twitter thread (about coffee, specifically):
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/9...591453696.html
Jim is a Remainer, obviously, but feel free to follow the links to the EU tariff and scheme pages and draw your own conclusions on what the actual tariffs from developing countries are.
The counter argument is that for those countries that currently DO have tariffs (Brazil, China, etc) we could certainly reduce our food bill by unilaterally reducing their tariffs to 0. However, increased imports of foodstuffs from those countries would mean increased pressure on developing countries to compete, and would probably harm those developing countries more. It’s a balancing act that we need to be on the right side of.Comment
-
Two of the most common arguments I hear against the EU are:
1) It's no problem to trade with the EU on WTO rules, every other country does it, what a waste of money paying to access the single market.
2) The EU is a protectionist trading block that impoverishes anyone nation outside by not allowing them to trade into the EU.
I'm alright JackComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment