I had a long chat with CPBWRN. We agree to disagree. I understand all his points and agree with what he says.
One point that CPBWRN made was most here look at the last 5 pages or so. Maybe some of you should have a look at the first few threads. You can search for everything with bn66 in the title - this is the first http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ight-back.html
I am happy to debate with anyone. I have been proved wrong before - in which case I have held my hands up and said fair cop guv.
I will also admit that my comments are more appropriate to a closed forum.
In the early days it was DR and I against the trolls. Possibly there would have been no NTRT without us.
One thing I have found about the ignore user option is that people have this habit of quoting what they say so you get to see it anyway. Or someone replies without quoting and you wonder what the hell they were on about.
Back on topic - I advise against using MTM until they get our case sorted - specifically I want WG to sue the HMRC5.
Another thing I will admit - it makes zero difference what our views are on here. It won't change the mind of WG. Similarly it was almost impossible to change the views of parliament - though worth a try - without the f4j style antics.
Would someone mind quoting this please?
One point that CPBWRN made was most here look at the last 5 pages or so. Maybe some of you should have a look at the first few threads. You can search for everything with bn66 in the title - this is the first http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...ight-back.html
I am happy to debate with anyone. I have been proved wrong before - in which case I have held my hands up and said fair cop guv.
I will also admit that my comments are more appropriate to a closed forum.
In the early days it was DR and I against the trolls. Possibly there would have been no NTRT without us.
One thing I have found about the ignore user option is that people have this habit of quoting what they say so you get to see it anyway. Or someone replies without quoting and you wonder what the hell they were on about.
Back on topic - I advise against using MTM until they get our case sorted - specifically I want WG to sue the HMRC5.
Another thing I will admit - it makes zero difference what our views are on here. It won't change the mind of WG. Similarly it was almost impossible to change the views of parliament - though worth a try - without the f4j style antics.
Would someone mind quoting this please?
Comment