Originally posted by nevergiveup
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
 - Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
 
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	This topic is closed.
				
				
				
				X
X
					Collapse
				
				
				
					
					
						
						
					
					
						
							
						
					
				
				
				
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
						
					
					
					
					
				- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Met my MP at the weekend, he's since confirmed that he's meeting Catherine McKinnell this evening.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
MP meeting last Friday
Had a more positive session with my MP than the previous time we met last September, when he was entirely non-committal. He was very interested in David Gauke's quotes from the original 2008 Finance Bill Committee and certainly seemed happy to exert some influence (as a senior Tory) in favour of the amendment. Will update Whitehouse with more details.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
MP
Just received a very kind response straight back from my MP, Richard Fuller. He is following up today. Very impressed by his speed of response and that he was prepared to take action at such short notice. Feeling a little better about politics for once!Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Clarification
This was a bad choice of words. What I meant was that there would be further lobbying tactics prior to the amendment being debated.Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostThere will also be further surprises coming down the line.
Apologies if I gave the wrong impression to some people.
							
						Last edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 10 June 2013, 12:40.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
No worries DR, that's what I took it to mean.Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostThis was a bad choice of words. What I meant was that there would be further lobbying tactics prior to the amendment being debated.
Apologies if I gave the wrong impression to some people.
Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
					
					
					
				- Home
 - News & Features
 - First Timers
 - IR35 / S660 / BN66
 - Employee Benefit Trusts
 - Agency Workers Regulations
 - MSC Legislation
 - Limited Companies
 - Dividends
 - Umbrella Company
 - VAT / Flat Rate VAT
 - Job News & Guides
 - Money News & Guides
 - Guide to Contracts
 - Successful Contracting
 - Contracting Overseas
 - Contractor Calculators
 - MVL
 - Contractor Expenses
 
Advertisers

				
				
				
				
Comment