BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)

[BrilloPad]

Could we just draw the line under any arguments please.

BlasterBates is a troll. 2 rules with trolls :-
1. do not feed them
2. dont argue between ourselves over the troll.

Not only is BB happy : but HMRC head office is happy too. What is in the past is in the past : lets turn our attention on HMRC and the imminent oral hearing for the JR (I hear a whisper about 16th June but this is subject to change).

I would prefer a PM if anyone disagrees.

[kiwinlondon]

[QUOTE=BrilloPad;827038]Could we just draw the line under any arguments please.



June?? I thought there was one end of this month and ours next month?? I was gonna ask if anyone had heard any more about the April one.....

[BrilloPad]

[QUOTE=kiwinlondon;827043]

Could we just draw the line under any arguments please.



June?? I thought there was one end of this month and ours next month?? I was gonna ask if anyone had heard any more about the April one.....

It still all seems to be whispers at the moment......

[DonkeyRhubarb]

[QUOTE=kiwinlondon;827043]

Could we just draw the line under any arguments please.



June?? I thought there was one end of this month and ours next month?? I was gonna ask if anyone had heard any more about the April one.....

The courts are a bit like buliders. Whatever timescale they give you, double it and then add some for good measure.

I've heard that the PwC oral hearing has been delayed, and it looks like we are now first up.

The High Court has an oral hearing listed for Montpelier on 16th June but we are still trying to confirm if that's us.

Watch this space...

[BrilloPad]

[QUOTE=DonkeyRhubarb;827068]

The courts are a bit like buliders. Whatever timescale they give you, double it and then add some for good measure.

I've heard that the PwC oral hearing has been delayed, and it looks like we are now first up.

The High Court has an oral hearing listed for Montpelier on 16th June but we are still trying to confirm if that's us.

Watch this space...

I wish HMRC head office would post here to confirm!

I need some time to get my t-shirt printed.........

[ASB]

I make no apologies. Sometimes we need to spell it out as it is; if you are not supporting the issue leave. This is a very serious matter for lots of people and their families, myself included. We don't need arbitrators and commenter’s popping in and out trying to eat away at peoples drive.

Actually I think you might need different views other than total support. Most - but not all - non combatants aren't trying to eat away -only look at balance. If you don't think there is any viable view other than your own you are truly dead in your argument.

Edit: Ballcat. The quote doesn't seem to have worked. Should have been silver_lining.

Edit x 2: Ballcat wasn't a dig at futurecat. Just trying to avoid the profanity filter.

[silver_lining]

Actually I think you might need different views other than total support. Most - but not all - non combatants aren't trying to eat away -only look at balance. If you don't think there is any viable view other than your own you are truly dead in your argument.

Edit: Ballcat. The quote doesn't seem to have worked. Should have been silver_lining.

Edit x 2: Ballcat wasn't a dig at futurecat. Just trying to avoid the profanity filter.

There is only one 'viable' view in this instance, and that is justice.... any else doesn't cut it; as such I believe it is a shared view.

Brillo, take your points you raise through all channels... Lets get back on track....

I asked this question a while back, can 'joe pub' attend the oral or is it in private?

[ASB]

There is only one 'viable' view in this instance, and that is justice.... any else doesn't cut it; as such I believe it is a shared view.

You're right there. But what's your definition?

[BrilloPad]

You're right there. But what's your definition?

Good question! Could I start off by saying what it is not :-
1. it is not retrospection.
2. it is not picking on a certain group
3. it is not bullying and intimidation.
4. it is not lieing.

And you are quite right : we should consider the views of other groups. Alas the threads have attracted a few trolls. Mostly in the early days.

cuk attracts alot of trolls. BB has had a go at me on other threads and I believe the only reason for his prescence here was to have ago at us as a group but particularly me.

[mossman]

But for many, if not most, of us that is not the case. And the remainder of your reasons were a reaction to IR35 - they came after, not before.

The reason is clear – they cannot tolerate that we don’t want their “employment protection”, their unions, there whole corrupt socialist system. Look at what Gordon Brown has done to our country. We stand in stark contrast to all of that. They are consumers of wealth, we are creators of wealth.

Spot on Toocan!