• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    To be fair IT contractors did have a history of totally taking the Michael in respect of avoiding (it was borderline or clear evasion in many cases) NI and Income Tax prior to IR35. The number of one man Ltd companies
    Plenty of people were barely disguised or even blatantly openly employees and claiming massive expenses against their tax and NI liabilities. Many contractors left a permie desk on Friday and sat down at the same desk on the next Monday, it used to be incredibly common. Plus for the more adventurous there were some rediculous offshore schemes with oddball loans repaid in comical freefall currencies.
    Because there were so many IT contractors compared to other types of self employed professionals (building trades have had their own regulations for years) collectively we errected a colossal neon pink and green target for HMG and the then Inland Revenue to shoot at.

    That's why they hate us!!!!!
    I disagree. I think they see us as glorified typists. Which is why they are happy to see us offshored. In the world trade talks we are the sacrifice.

    They have no comprehension of what we do. At the moment in banks the IT and middle-office and research are being offshored. Next will be traders. Then will be the management. No more City. UK will be totally f**ked if they carry on with their current policy.

    Comment


      Nah, "The city" accounts for less than manufacturing in the UK doesn't it?
      "Israel, Palestine, Cats." He Said
      "See?"

      Comment


        Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
        To be fair IT contractors did have a history of totally taking the Michael in respect of avoiding (it was borderline or clear evasion in many cases) NI and Income Tax prior to IR35. The number of one man Ltd companies
        Plenty of people were barely disguised or even blatantly openly employees and claiming massive expenses against their tax and NI liabilities. Many contractors left a permie desk on Friday and sat down at the same desk on the next Monday, it used to be incredibly common. Plus for the more adventurous there were some rediculous offshore schemes with oddball loans repaid in comical freefall currencies.
        Because there were so many IT contractors compared to other types of self employed professionals (building trades have had their own regulations for years) collectively we errected a colossal neon pink and green target for HMG and the then Inland Revenue to shoot at.

        That's why they hate us!!!!!
        I couldnt disagree more! What company be they a small sole trader or large corporate does not utilise advantages to maximise its profits? IT contractors are businesses, every business in its right mind looks to minimise its tax position, from BP and Shell to Daves corner shop. We were and are no different.

        Comment


          Originally posted by smalldog View Post
          I couldnt disagree more! What company be they a small sole trader or large corporate does not utilise advantages to maximise its profits? IT contractors are businesses, every business in its right mind looks to minimise its tax position, from BP and Shell to Daves corner shop. We were and are no different.
          But BP or Shell doesn't earn most of its profits in the Isle of Man, and if they did they'd be in deep sh*t.

          That's one of the questions I ask myself when I see a scheme. If it is so good why don't big companies do this?
          I'm alright Jack

          Comment


            Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
            But BP or Shell doesn't earn most of its profits in the Isle of Man, and if they did they'd be in deep sh*t.

            That's one of the questions I ask myself when I see a scheme. If it is so good why don't big companies do this?
            But Google channels them through Ireland.
            'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
            Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

            Comment


              Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
              But Google channels them through Ireland.
              that's true...but they do have an office and an employee or two there as well.

              which for me would be a hint as to how to make it work.

              I'm alright Jack

              Comment


                Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                But BP or Shell doesn't earn most of its profits in the Isle of Man, and if they did they'd be in deep sh*t.

                That's one of the questions I ask myself when I see a scheme. If it is so good why don't big companies do this?
                Blaster, Im amazed at your indepth knowledge of bluechip capital movements! hehe...you miss my point, it is the right of every company (be them a sole trader or bluechip) to optimize their tax position. If to achieve the minimised tax position requires exploitation of a LEGAL loophole then it is not the individuals responsibility NOT to use it purely on moral grounds if its available.

                you asked a question in an earlier post: "why should you not pay UK tax?", because the taxation system had provided us with a legal opportunity not too. S.58 supports the fact it was legal, if it wasnt we would be prosecuted. S.58 also shows it was a legitimate loophole otherwise why would any new form of legisatlion be required, if its wasnt a legitimate loophole HMRC would just have had to reinforce the pre-existing legislation.

                From a moral standpoint I dont really care what people do or dont think of my attitude towards the avoidance of reducing my PAYE. In fact my attitude towards tax has hardened dramatically of late, just watching programmes like "The Hospital" last night made me want to kick the TV in when I realised its tax payers money being used to operate on these F**king lazy good for nothings who cant stop shovelling SH** into their mouths. And to top it all, two obese people who cant work as they are two fat to get a job (apparently) are claiming legitimate disability benefit. So if I get our society right, you can do nothing, eat yourself to near death, get social security and disability payments, and then get free £10k treatment to fix you by way of a gastric band operation!!! give me strength!!!!

                and we get accussed of cheating the system...not being funny, if you are going to target groups of people I think there are some slightly more obscene cheaters in our society than IT contractors!
                Last edited by smalldog; 23 April 2009, 10:58.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                  that's true...but they do have an office and an employee or two there as well.

                  which for me would be a hint as to how to make it work.

                  when i ran a ltd company i had a office and was hiring people, building a business, Mr Brown and IR35 still came after me, wasted my time....the are a waste of space and the current govt doesnt give a flying .... about anyone but themselves and keeping them in there 2nd homes
                  When is comes to the HMRC and Gordy. Im a fighter not a lover

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by smalldog View Post
                    Blaster, Im amazed at your indepth knowledge of bluechip capital movements! hehe...you miss my point, it is the right of every company (be them a sole trader or bluechip) to optimize their tax position. If to achieve the minimised tax position requires exploitation of a LEGAL loophole then it is not the individuals responsibility NOT to use it purely on moral grounds if its available.

                    you asked a question in an earlier post: "why should you not pay UK tax?", because the taxation system had provided us with a legal opportunity not too. S.58 supports the fact it was legal, if it wasnt we would be prosecuted. S.58 also shows it was a legitimate loophole otherwise why would any new form of legisatlion be required, if its wasnt a legitimate loophole HMRC would just have had to reinforce the pre-existing legislation.

                    From a moral standpoint I dont really care what people do or dont think of my attitude towards the avoidance of reducing my PAYE. In fact my attitude towards tax has hardened dramatically of late, just watching programmes like "The Hospital" last night made me want to kick the TV in when I realised its tax payers money being used to operate on these F**king lazy good for nothings who cant stop shovelling SH** into their mouths. And to top it all, two obese people who cant work as they are two fat to get a job (apparently) are claiming legitimate disability benefit. So if I get our society right, you can do nothing, eat yourself to near death, get social security and disability payments, and then get free £10k treatment to fix you by way of a gastric band operation!!! give me strength!!!!

                    and we get accussed of cheating the system...not being funny, if you are going to target groups of people I think there are some slightly more obscene cheaters in our society than IT contractors!
                    Top Dog



                    BB is worse than Mal
                    Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                    "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Emigre View Post
                      Top Dog



                      BB is worse than Mal
                      I agree with that. IMO Mal actually provided some use as he made us think (though he lied a bit as well).

                      BB should go back to posting DOOM threads.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X