• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by nevergoingtopay View Post
    Looks like this scheme has won it's second round with HMRC.

    It was an EBT based in the IOM.
    Looks like the scheme operators are asking for the investigation to be closed now.
    How is this different from the other IOM schemes?
    Mr Youknowwho, can't you just make some retrospective changes for this???? Seems unfair these people's families aren't forced into bankruptcy and poverty.

    Comment


      Originally posted by helen7 View Post
      Mr Youknowwho, can't you just make some retrospective changes for this???? Seems unfair these people's families aren't forced into bankruptcy and poverty.
      The Troll speaks.

      Comment


        Originally posted by helen7 View Post
        Mr Youknowwho, can't you just make some retrospective changes for this???? Seems unfair these people's families aren't forced into bankruptcy and poverty.
        Given that they seem to have won, can I retrospectively change my tax
        returns to join the EBT?

        Comment


          Originally posted by dezze View Post
          The Troll speaks.
          helens' posts have recently been very good. Lets just keep an eye on her eh.....

          Comment


            Discrimination

            Compare this:

            http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2008/bn66.pdf

            and this:

            http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/budget2009/bn60.pdf

            They are both "artificial" schemes, so what's the difference?

            The response to the following FOI request could be interesting. If the schemes covered by BN60 have cost the Treasury a similar amount (or more) than BN66, then why was the latter retrospectively clarified and the former not?

            http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/reques...ance_bill_2009

            Where is the consistency? Where is the legitimate expectation? Where is the certainty?

            Could it be that there is one law for the institutions and another for the little guy?

            The Government's position is indefencible. You can't just apply retrospective tax in arbitrary fashion whenever you fancy. There lies tyrany.

            Comment


              DPA Request

              I have submitted my DPA request - it took 2 minutes.
              I am very interested to see what I get back from them. There should be some very interesting reading...
              If you haven't done so already - do it now! Find out what information they hold on you...

              As SantaClaus says:
              " Submit a Data Protection Act request and get Mr YouKnowWho (TM) to do some work "
              BN66 DPA thread link
              Sunt Lacrimae Rerum

              Comment


                MP Meeting - further contact

                Just to let you know that my MP phoned me (!).
                She wanted to let me know that she is still waiting to hear from the treasury and is chasing them for some proper answers/information...

                I'm sure not all MPs are like her, but she is onside and seems genuinely interested in helping me/us.

                Want to meet your MP?
                PM me and I will send you through some documentation that will help structure your meeting.

                Every MP meeting is very beneficial for us all.
                Sunt Lacrimae Rerum

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Ratican View Post
                  Just to let you know that my MP phoned me (!).
                  She wanted to let me know that she is still waiting to hear from the treasury and is chasing them for some proper answers/information...

                  I'm sure not all MPs are like her, but she is onside and seems genuinely interested in helping me/us.

                  Want to meet your MP?
                  PM me and I will send you through some documentation that will help structure your meeting.

                  Every MP meeting is very beneficial for us all.
                  should we read anything into the fact the treasury dont appear to have responded to any of the MP's letters yet? Are they scared, couldnt care less, biding their time?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by dezze View Post
                    The Troll speaks.
                    I was being ironic!!

                    Comment


                      Petition PM to resign

                      28,000 votes, 2nd place.

                      http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/please-go/

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X