Cheers DR.... fingers crossed.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back!!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Guy's,
Just been looking at the following document:
http://www.publications.parliament.u...m.145-151.html
" 134
Clause 55, page 27, line 31, leave out ‘are treated as always having had effect’ and
insert ‘shall have effect from 6th April 2008’.
"
Any thoughts ?SAY NO TO RETROSPECTIVE TAXComment
-
Originally posted by zippo View PostGuy's,
Just been looking at the following document:
http://www.publications.parliament.u...m.145-151.html
" 134
Clause 55, page 27, line 31, leave out ‘are treated as always having had effect’ and
insert ‘shall have effect from 6th April 2008’.
"
Any thoughts ?Comment
-
zippo,
You got to it before me. The first ammendment I posted the other day was from Lib Dem MPs. Now, the Conservatives have pitched in with two more, one of which is the one you referred to.
If these get approved then it should kill off the retrospective effect completely.
These may be debated today, in which case we should know by tomorrow.
Watch this space!Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Postzippo,
You got to it before me. The first ammendment I posted the other day was from Lib Dem MPs. Now, the Conservatives have pitched in with two more, one of which is the one you referred to.
If these get approved then it should kill off the retrospective effect completely.
These may be debated today, in which case we should know by tomorrow.
Watch this space!
Gosh - everyone is on our side! I have never felt so loved.
Does this mean that Mal will vote Labour? :-)Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
Does this mean that Mal will vote Labour? :-)
FWIW I hope they win simply to put one over on NL. I have no sympathy for the position they find themselves in.Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostYeah right. All pigs fed and ready for launch...
Originally posted by malvolio View PostFWIW I hope they win simply to put one over on NL. I have no sympathy for the position they find themselves in.Comment
-
clarification
Can anyone clarify for me please, as I'm not familiar with the inner workings of government, do those debating these amendments have the power to make these changes happen, will there be a vote of some kind, if so what is the composition of the voting body, does the government have a majority etc... I am thrilled that the buggers may be forced to eat humble pie, but I dont want to get too excited if the committee is only giving 'recommendations' or whatever,Comment
-
Originally posted by poppy01 View PostCan anyone clarify for me please, as I'm not familiar with the inner workings of government, do those debating these amendments have the power to make these changes happen, will there be a vote of some kind, if so what is the composition of the voting body, does the government have a majority etc... I am thrilled that the buggers may be forced to eat humble pie, but I dont want to get too excited if the committee is only giving 'recommendations' or whatever,
Simply put, barring a back bench rebellion or an upset in the House of Lords a government with a decent majority can pretty much do what it wants if it really wants to.
EDIT : Since it's taxation related the Lords don't debate it, they just rubber stamp it automatically. Barring a decent number of Labour MP's getting upset about it, it will get passed in whatever form the Govt decides it wants.Last edited by DaveB; 22 May 2008, 15:43."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by DaveB View PostThis gives a pretty good summary of it.
Simply put, barring a back bench rebellion or an upset in the House of Lords a government with a decent majority can pretty much do what it wants if it really wants to.
EDIT : Since it's taxation related the Lords don't debate it, they just rubber stamp it automatically. Barring a decent number of Labour MP's getting upset about it, it will get passed in whatever form the Govt decides it wants.Blog? What blog...?Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Today 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Comment