I am looking to apply for a first time mortgage but, now being faced with the dilemma of taking a 6 month PAYE role via a recruitment agency or another 12 month fixed term contract direct with an employer, I'm unsure which would make me more of a risk to a lender. Although I have been contracting for a few years now, I have had a recent gap of 6 months, with previous contracts being mainly Inside IR35 roles.
I took the offer of the fixed term contract (with pension and benefits) but there is no room to build a warchest, and I have signed the contract. Sod's law, an interview came up on the inside role and I've been told the client is now likely to offer.
Would I be less likely to get a mortgage approved on the short term contract even though the income would of course be higher? Fixed term is closer to home with less hours but the flip side is no money for a warchest and still no guarantee that it will go the full year or either one of us could gives notice of a week in those first 3 months. Plus, having signed and due to start the FTE role next week I'm not sure if it's too late to pull out.
I took the offer of the fixed term contract (with pension and benefits) but there is no room to build a warchest, and I have signed the contract. Sod's law, an interview came up on the inside role and I've been told the client is now likely to offer.
Would I be less likely to get a mortgage approved on the short term contract even though the income would of course be higher? Fixed term is closer to home with less hours but the flip side is no money for a warchest and still no guarantee that it will go the full year or either one of us could gives notice of a week in those first 3 months. Plus, having signed and due to start the FTE role next week I'm not sure if it's too late to pull out.
Comment