Hi all,
I’d really appreciate your input on this situation I’m currently facing as a contractor:
I joined a new assignment via an agency and, before starting, the umbrella company I was asked to use confirmed that payments would be made weekly in arrears. That seemed standard and acceptable, so I went ahead and signed the agreement.
However, once the role began, I was informed by the agency that although invoices go out weekly, they won’t release any funds until 30 days after the first invoice. And even then, they only pay one week’s worth per week, meaning I’ll only receive the full first month’s earnings by the end of 60 days.
So essentially, I’m delivering work continuously for 4–5 weeks before seeing any payment, and not fully paid for that first month’s work until two months later. I’m a contractor — not a bank.
For context, the umbrella company only earns a small margin per payslip and has told me they’re tied down because the agency’s agreement states “weekly invoicing, 30-day payment terms.” I even changed umbrella companies to try to find a more flexible arrangement, but the result is the same because of the agency’s policy. The agency refuses to alter that clause.
Is this a fair setup? Is it becoming more common? Or should we be pushing back harder on this kind of arrangement?
Would really value your thoughts and whether others have faced something similar — or found ways to negotiate more realistic payment models.
Thanks in advance!
I’d really appreciate your input on this situation I’m currently facing as a contractor:
I joined a new assignment via an agency and, before starting, the umbrella company I was asked to use confirmed that payments would be made weekly in arrears. That seemed standard and acceptable, so I went ahead and signed the agreement.
However, once the role began, I was informed by the agency that although invoices go out weekly, they won’t release any funds until 30 days after the first invoice. And even then, they only pay one week’s worth per week, meaning I’ll only receive the full first month’s earnings by the end of 60 days.
So essentially, I’m delivering work continuously for 4–5 weeks before seeing any payment, and not fully paid for that first month’s work until two months later. I’m a contractor — not a bank.
For context, the umbrella company only earns a small margin per payslip and has told me they’re tied down because the agency’s agreement states “weekly invoicing, 30-day payment terms.” I even changed umbrella companies to try to find a more flexible arrangement, but the result is the same because of the agency’s policy. The agency refuses to alter that clause.
Is this a fair setup? Is it becoming more common? Or should we be pushing back harder on this kind of arrangement?
Would really value your thoughts and whether others have faced something similar — or found ways to negotiate more realistic payment models.
Thanks in advance!

Comment