• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Web forums to be blocked"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    The emphasis on internet child porn is ludicrous. Cracking down on the internet is just a way to push the problem underground without really tackling it, lets the politicians feel smug while kids go on being abused. I say so because:

    a) Yes, child abusers do also tend to be among the highest searchers for child porn but then geeks who like gadgets probably spend a lot of time online looking for gadgets. People search for what interests them, a correlation does not show a cause.

    b) There are extremely high rates of child abuse in some of the world's poorest societies where almost nobody has internet access. In Uganda and among the Australian aborigines for example. It is more about the culture of the society than online influences.

    Given point a) it would make far more sense to do nothing whatever about internet child porn and then investigate those who view it.

    Similarly, terrorism etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    £4 a week with the two draws and the forthcoming price increase.
    You don't have to buy a ticket to each draw. Or even each week.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Er, I thought it was a tax on the terminally stupid.
    Yes, in the same way speed cameras are a tax on the motorists, they are both easily avoided

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Like the CUK Lottery Syndicate you mean?

    £1 a week on a lottery ticket is harmless fantasy.
    £4 a week with the two draws and the forthcoming price increase.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Er, I thought it was a tax on the terminally stupid.
    Like the CUK Lottery Syndicate you mean?

    £1 a week on a lottery ticket is harmless fantasy.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
    Alcohol and cigarettes are on the block list for the porn law as well
    Please provide a credible link to back that up.


    Anyway if they did include booze sites in the setup, everyone would be far happier because then by opting out of the block you are not obviously just wanting porn, you might simply want to order some wine.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by MPwannadecentincome View Post
    LOL turned on Talk Talk Homesafe and this counts National Lottery as gambling - site is blocked - that was supposed to be government sponsored gambling!
    Most filters class it as gambling and block it.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    TalkTalk HomeSafe is not what everyone is going to get as a result of the upcoming changes. That is a far higher level of filtering for parents, etc, to turn on. It also blocks sites selling alcohol, etc.
    And my homebrew forum!
    (Fortunately my landlady hates This censorship and turned it off)

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    TalkTalk HomeSafe is not what everyone is going to get as a result of the upcoming changes. That is a far higher level of filtering for parents, etc, to turn on. It also blocks sites selling alcohol, etc.
    Alcohol and cigarettes are on the block list for the porn law as well

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    TalkTalk HomeSafe is not what everyone is going to get as a result of the upcoming changes. That is a far higher level of filtering for parents, etc, to turn on. It also blocks sites selling alcohol, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    national lottery is blocked

    LOL turned on Talk Talk Homesafe and this counts National Lottery as gambling - site is blocked - that was supposed to be government sponsored gambling!

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I noticed the bit about 'esoteric websites'. Does that mean censoring the Flying Spaghetti Monster?
    I don't fancy these guys' chances: Crank Dot Net

    Leave a comment:


  • amcdonald
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Yep, I've heard that they're going to start blocking political websites, particularly those in opposition :-)
    So maybe to hide any UKIP related content on the web then

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    I noticed the bit about 'esoteric websites'. Does that mean censoring the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X