• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Meanwhile in the west"

Collapse

  • NotAllThere
    replied
    It's the former. Social housing tenants in under-occupied house get less housing benefit. That's why they're having to pay more.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Is this a regular house where the tenants are on benefits, or a special council house where the council allocate people to the house?

    In the former case, you're a bit stuffed in this sort of situation or even if someone leaves home - you basically have to move?

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Ah, so they're not being 'charged'. The rent is the same as it always was. They're entitled to less housing benefit because they no longer have their daughter. Very sad, but I don't think it's wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Seems fair enough... If it was a room in their house they can do what they want with it. Problem is it isn't their house.

    Leave a comment:


  • rob s
    replied
    In tomorrow's Daily Mail, 'Shrines Cure Cancer'.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    The Daily Wail are supporting benefit cheats now? I'm so confused.
    Its the wail. Consistency is not a strong point.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    The Wail

    I'm much more interested in the size of Kelly Brook's assets.




    I mean, how much is her house worth?

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    The Daily Wail are supporting benefit cheats now? I'm so confused.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Meanwhile in the west

    Meanwhile in the west

    Family to be charged £650 a year by council for keeping seven-year-old daughter's bedroom as a shrine after she died of cancer | Mail Online

    Should the reduction in benefits apply to this distraught family?

Working...
X