Reply to: sockiepostcount = sockiepostcount + 1

[Pondlife]

[mudskipper]

in FORTRAN IV:

ISOCKPC = ISOCKPC +1

Shouldn't integer variable names start with i ... n? Or did I make that up?

[SupremeSpod]

in FORTRAN IV:

SOCKPC = SOCKPC +1
Go To (3,4,5,6), SOCKPC

Ftfy

[SupremeSpod]

Told you what, prickstain?

Wtf is a "prickstain"?

[suityou01]

Steady, he'll get the hump. He number 1 tech, much codings many experiencings, he love you long time!




Told you...

Told you what, prickstain?

[SupremeSpod]

Should be in camel case:

SockiePostCount++;

Steady, he'll get the hump. He number 1 tech, much codings many experiencings, he love you long time!

Nice

Better put the wine down, I'm warming to you Doogie

Told you...

[TestMangler]

Give me a shout when the code is ready and deployed to the test environment. I'll free up a resource from another workstream to test it.

[SimonMac]

Threads like this make me happy I am not a code monkey

[Robinho]

No it shouldn't. Only functions should start with capital letters. Variables and objects should be camel case bar the first character so

sockiePostCount++;

This

[d000hg]

In one obscure language I used it would be Sockie-Post-Count

[BrilloPad]

I think it shouls be an++ where n is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, .....

Why let anyone else understand you code?

Prefrably put it in an interface and add a few layers of function calls too.

[eek]

m_szSockiePostCount?

If it was using JDE convention it would be tbSoPoCo where tb was a two letter code representing the table name. Whoever invented it need ed to be

[suityou01]

m_szSockiePostCount?

Nice

Better put the wine down, I'm warming to you Doogie

[d000hg]

m_szSockiePostCount?

[NickFitz]

In PHP it'd be sckie_postCount.