• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Accenture.com

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Accenture.com"

Collapse

  • dropcliffsnotbombs
    replied
    http://www.accidenture.com/

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by interested View Post
    You don't become a $30bn company if you're no good.
    You can become a $266bn company and be rubbish though

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Pedant
    I suppose accuracy is optional for your chosen career path?

    Leave a comment:


  • interested
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    How do they do it?
    Because you'd be surprised at how poorly some companies are run, hence the need to go to a consultant; or that they consider a business function non-strategic, hence the need to outsource.

    You don't become a $30bn company if you're no good.

    Yes, I have worked for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Wrong - AFAIK they split out from Arthur Andersen but had to change name and it turned out to be one the best rebranding exercises after AA was done for in Enron case.
    Pedant

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    They went bust, changed the name and are now regarded as the "arse coverers solution"
    Wrong - AFAIK they split out from Arthur Andersen but had to change name and it turned out to be one the best rebranding exercises after AA was done for in Enron case.

    Leave a comment:


  • TriggerHippy
    replied
    These sites actually make use of a highly technical solution....

    http://www.andrewdavidson.com/gibberish/

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by bandit_legs View Post
    www.accenture.com

    Opportunity isnt always obvious.

    They went bust, changed the name and are now regarded as the "arse coverers solution"

    Leave a comment:


  • alreadypacked
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    If you think Acceture are bad you should see the Atlas Consortium.

    Atlast or Alas would be more fitting.
    Lucky I don't have SC, our paths may never meet.

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    If you think Acceture are bad you should see the Atlas Consortium.

    Atlast or Alas would be more fitting.

    Leave a comment:


  • alreadypacked
    replied
    Originally posted by Pondlife View Post
    After being caught with your pants down "it's what you do next that counts"
    In my experience of Accenture, find someone else to blame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pondlife
    replied
    "The road to high performance isn't always paved" although there may still be some trees.

    After being caught with your pants down "it's what you do next that counts"

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Aside from the obvious Tiger Woods jokes,
    Nah. Let's get to it.

    "High Performance. Delivered." Straight into a fire hydrant.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    It is generally taken to mean that there are (and always will be) a lot of gullible people in the world.
    Thus Wikipedia inadvertantly explains its own continued existence.

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    I think he's just spotted another potential hole to aim for
    He certainly appears to be deep in the bush in that pic

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X