• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hays Umbrella companies"

Collapse

  • Dorkeaux
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post

    It's not how they do salary sacrifice into SIPPs it is how they use Salary sacrifice instead of the more typical 5% employer / 3% employee contribution and then pocket all or most of the NI savings that approach generates.

    Now I can see the logic behind doing it but if you are going to try and play such a game it should be clearly explained and demonstrated on the KID on the worst culprits haven't done that on the KIDs linked to above.
    It's both.
    a) The charge(s) for processing salary sacrifice and paying into the SIPP
    b) Whether they pocket the savings in NI generated by lowering your net income, or add the NI savings back into your gross salary.

    Agreed, both of these should be on the KID.

    Of course from 6 April 2029 the government is capping the National Insurance (NI) exemption for workplace pension contributions made through salary sacrifice at £2,000 per tax year. https://brookson.co.uk/2026/06/08/le...a-contractors/

    We are busily maxing out our SIPPs, including taking advantage of the "Carry Forward" rule.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by Dorkeaux View Post
    Like Croesus, +1 for NASA.
    As eek alludes, most of the big ones are too close to call, aside from how they deal with salary sacrifice into SIPPs.
    It's not how they do salary sacrifice into SIPPs it is how they use Salary sacrifice instead of the more typical 5% employer / 3% employee contribution and then pocket all or most of the NI savings that approach generates.

    Now I can see the logic behind doing it but if you are going to try and play such a game it should be clearly explained and demonstrated on the KID on the worst culprits haven't done that on the KIDs linked to above.
    Last edited by eek; 22 June 2026, 15:39.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadkingbilly
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    Have you asked your accountant which they would suggest?
    <groan>

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Have you asked your accountant which they would suggest?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dorkeaux
    replied
    Like Croesus, +1 for NASA.
    As eek alludes, most of the big ones are too close to call, aside from how they deal with salary sacrifice into SIPPs.

    If that's not an issue, just look at the KIDs. You'll see they are much of a muchness.
    I've used Paystream, Giant and NASA and found them fine in this regard.

    When it comes to salary sacrifice, Giant insisted on signing me up to their "Platinum" package which provided a ton of useless crap that I would never use. It was relatively expensive.
    NASA charges £20 a month to deal with salary sacrifice, and they pass on the NI savings rather than pocketing them.

    Maybe there are better deals out there, but I found that acceptable.
    Last edited by Dorkeaux; 21 June 2026, 09:33. Reason: Site stripped out CR/LF characters..

    Leave a comment:


  • Croesus
    replied
    +1 for NASA. They were very easy to deal with, especially salary sacrifice arrangements etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by hobnob View Post
    If you have a question about umbrella companies, it makes sense to post it in the "Umbrella Companies" forum:
    Umbrella Companies - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

    You can also search the forum to see where people have mentioned the various companies before (rather than hoping that people will see this post and then repeat the same info they've posted before).

    Even then, it depends on your requirements. E.g. I'm with NASA Umbrella, and they've been pretty good overall. However, here's a previous discussion where people reported problems:
    NASA Umbrella, any good? - Contractor UK Bulletin Board
    I think the main difference is that TheDel wanted to put money into a SIPP, which I'm not doing. That might or might not be an issue for you.
    If you aren’t going for a SIPP look at the key information documents and avoid the ones who don’t list pensions as a employer deduction because there is a reason behind that - umbrellas are starting to use salary sacrifice games to pocket any employer NI savings from pensions.

    Leave a comment:


  • hobnob
    replied
    If you have a question about umbrella companies, it makes sense to post it in the "Umbrella Companies" forum:
    Umbrella Companies - Contractor UK Bulletin Board

    You can also search the forum to see where people have mentioned the various companies before (rather than hoping that people will see this post and then repeat the same info they've posted before).

    Even then, it depends on your requirements. E.g. I'm with NASA Umbrella, and they've been pretty good overall. However, here's a previous discussion where people reported problems:
    NASA Umbrella, any good? - Contractor UK Bulletin Board
    I think the main difference is that TheDel wanted to put money into a SIPP, which I'm not doing. That might or might not be an issue for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delboypass
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    There's loads of info over in Accounting / Legal about umbrellas.
    These ones are the only ones allowed to be selected under Hays - so just looking for any good or bad experiences.

    Probably going to go with Giant but have to Monday to decide..

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    There's loads of info over in Accounting / Legal about umbrellas.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delboypass
    started a topic Hays Umbrella companies

    Hays Umbrella companies

    Need to go Umbrella through Hays

    this is the list of Umbrellas provided.

    Anyone good or bad on list based on peoples experience?

    All charges seem much for much

    Hays Preferred Supplier List - Umbrella Providers | Hays
    Umbrella company Accreditations Website Phone number Key information
    Sapphire Contracting Ltd FCSA wearesapphire.co.uk 01625 539 997 Sapphire KID.pdf
    Clipper Contracting Ltd FCSA clippercontracting.co.uk 01305 233 170 Clipper KID.pdf
    Workwell Solutions Ltd FCSA workwellcontractorsolutions.com 01923 257 257 Workwell KID.pdf
    Brookson One FCSA brooksonone.co.uk 0800 230 0213 Brookson KID.pdf
    Danbro Ltd FCSA danbro.co.uk 01253 600 140 Danbro KID.pdf
    Umbrella.co.uk FCSA umbrella.co.uk 01625 546 610 Umbrella KID.pdf
    Focused Consulting Ltd FCSA focusedumbrella.co.uk 0161 923 0210 Focused KID.pdf
    Giant Professional Ltd FCSA giantgroup.com 0330 024 0946 Giant KID.pdf
    Parasol Ltd FCSA parasolgroup.co.uk 01925 939 160 Parasol KID.pdf
    N W M Contracting Ltd FCSA nwm.uk.com 0330 333 4240 NWM KID.pdf
    Nasa Umbrella Ltd FCSA nasagroup.co.uk 0117 929 7683 NASA KID.pdf
    Paystream My Max Ltd FCSA paystream.co.uk 0161 929 6000 Paystream KID.pdf

Working...
X