Originally posted by malvolio
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: 67 willies handing on the wall
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "67 willies handing on the wall"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
But they are rich people's children so they deserve to suffer!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
The revenue is not the point*. The social damage is far wider. There are families here who are using private schools for their SEND children that simply won't flourish in the state school sector while their current schools will have to close down. These are not huge flourishing academies like Millfield, most have 30-40 pupils
Taxing education - which no other country does - is the point. Plus removal of their charitable status, meaning, inter alia, a lot of bursaries and scholarships for gifted but less well off pupils are going to disappear.
It's a stupid and vindictive move that will gain f*** all in terms of GDP while causing a heap of collateral damage. A bit like all their other policies so far.
*EDIT Sorry, the revenue is the point. All they can see are numbers on an HMG bank account to spend on the public sector. Nothing else matters.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
When I was vat registered I claimed about 15-25% of it back, I did have nice shiny laptops and the best coffee etc. I didn't have any listed buildings to support though.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThereWell, from all those private schools that have shut down of course!
The point is that while it may well not make as much money as expected (what government tax changes ever do?), and while it may well cause difficulties for state schools, overall it's unlikely to end up with less revenue than in 2024. Let's check the books in 2026 and see what happens.
Taxing education - which no other country does - is the point. Plus removal of their charitable status, meaning, inter alia, a lot of bursaries and scholarships for gifted but less well off pupils are going to disappear.
It's a stupid and vindictive move that will gain f*** all in terms of GDP while causing a heap of collateral damage. A bit like all their other policies so far.
*EDIT Sorry, the revenue is the point. All they can see are numbers on an HMG bank account to spend on the public sector. Nothing else matters.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
Hmmm...
The £9bn is an estimate, but given a lot of smaller schools (you know, niche ones like those providing SEND support and the like) will be closing down, and the surviving public schools are now VAT registered meaning a lot of VAT will be claimed back for day-to-day items, nobody other than Phillipson believes the take will be anywhere near that.
£250m entering the state system at £7500 per pupil per year (NAO numbers, not mine) means another 33,000 odd extra pupils spread over 4000 or so state secondary schools, means about 8 pupils per school extra (assuming most public schools are secondary level). Then they will be hiring 6500 extra teachers (from where, you have to ask...), or 1-2 teachers per school.
It's all nonsense, isn't it.
When I was vat registered I claimed about 15-25% of it back, I did have nice shiny laptops and the best coffee etc. I didn't have any listed buildings to support though.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere
£9 billion expected to be raised from VAT on school fees. Cost for kids entering the state school system, £250 million.
That's Labour economics.
https://www.gbnews.com/news/surrey-c...r-vat-tax-raid
Look forward to lawyers taking councils to court in a big way.
No its eat the rich, Marxist policies for thickos!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere
£9 billion expected to be raised from VAT on school fees. Cost for kids entering the state school system, £250 million.
That's Labour economics.
The £9bn is an estimate, but given a lot of smaller schools (you know, niche ones like those providing SEND support and the like) will be closing down, and the surviving public schools are now VAT registered meaning a lot of VAT will be claimed back for day-to-day items, nobody other than Phillipson believes the take will be anywhere near that.
£250m entering the state system at £7500 per pupil per year (NAO numbers, not mine) means another 33,000 odd extra pupils spread over 4000 or so state secondary schools, means about 8 pupils per school extra (assuming most public schools are secondary level). Then they will be hiring 6500 extra teachers (from where, you have to ask...), or 1-2 teachers per school.
It's all nonsense, isn't it.
Leave a comment:
-
67 willies handing on the wall
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ll-claims.html
Nigel Farage and Reform UK would win 67 seats from Labour at the next General Election, new poll claims
...
Think tank More In Common produced the poll with survey data of more than 11,000 people between October 31 and December 16.
If the polling results were to be reflected across the country, none of the parties would be likely to have enough votes to secure a majority.
Labour would remain the largest party with 228 seats, just six more than the Conservatives on 222, Reform would surge to 72 seats, with the Lib Dems on 58 and the SNP on 37.
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Leave a comment: