• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Good to see the EU supporting democracy as usual"

Collapse

  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    It's been a principality for a long time now. Just like Monaco...

    But the big hill with the two peaks has been Yr Wyddfa for a lot longer than it's been Snowdon.
    Got to have some where to throw your druids from...

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post


    Who cares what a piece of the Principality of Wales is called.

    (Cue Welsh nationalists arguing it isn't and never was a principality.)
    It's been a principality for a long time now. Just like Monaco...

    But the big hill with the two peaks has been Yr Wyddfa for a lot longer than it's been Snowdon.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by woody1 View Post
    Now there's a place to send migrants to that would put them off coming here.
    Wales or Liverpool?

    Leave a comment:


  • DoctorStrangelove
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Very reminiscent of the Welsh(5000 of them, anyway) trying to steal Snowdonia back from the Liverpudlians by renaming it to something unpronounceable!
    And renaming the Brecon Beacons as Bannau Brycheiniog just to confuse the SAS.

    Cymru Am Byth!

    Twll dyn bob Sais!.

    There's Tidy Then. Especially for Mal

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by woody1 View Post
    Now there's a place to send migrants to that would put them off coming here.
    It would be cheaper than sending them to Rwanda.

    And it would make the Falklands Islands more genetically diverse.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
    Very reminiscent of the Welsh(5000 of them, anyway) trying to steal Snowdonia back from the Liverpudlians by renaming it to something unpronounceable!

    Who cares what a piece of the Principality of Wales is called.

    (Cue Welsh nationalists arguing it isn't and never was a principality.)

    Leave a comment:


  • woody1
    replied
    Now there's a place to send migrants to that would put them off coming here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zigenare
    replied
    Very reminiscent of the Welsh(5000 of them, anyway) trying to steal Snowdonia back from the Liverpudlians by renaming it to something unpronounceable!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by JustKeepSwimming View Post

    Why are you speaking as if the EU said 'We support Argentina's claim'. They didn't, Argentina asked for the Spanish version of the name to be used as well and either the EU didn't notice or didn't appreciate it's impact. Irony being 'Falkland Islands' in Catalan is 'illes malvines'.
    Big up Rhodesia!

    Leave a comment:


  • JustKeepSwimming
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    Ok from now lets quote Catalonia's right to independence etc. That is not that much of a big deal but it lead to beatings from the Spanish recently and approval from the EU.

    The Falklands were settled over 40 years ago when the Islanders clearly stated their preference, allowing the Argentinians to continue their aggressive fantasy is as appropriate as the British suggesting they should take back Israel, Africa & India, someone should have a word with the deluded dolts! The EU are perfectly placed the UN have already ruled on it.

    Can we ask that from now on that the EU support 'British Israel', 'British India', 'Rhodesia' etc? It's only fair!
    Why are you speaking as if the EU said 'We support Argentina's claim'. They didn't, Argentina asked for the Spanish version of the name to be used as well and either the EU didn't notice or didn't appreciate it's impact. Irony being 'Falkland Islands' in Catalan is 'illes malvines'.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by JustKeepSwimming View Post
    Such a stupid blunder.

    I don't think it's actually a big deal, stating both names is common, UN and the US both do it. I don't think it provides any indication of EU members stance on Falklands.

    What is stupid is the EU not realising what Argentina were going to do with this, it was obvious they would spin it and it's a failure of EU diplomacy skills to not see it coming. The reason there is so much talking and lawyers and advisers with diplomacy is to prevent this kind of blunder.
    Ok from now lets quote Catalonia's right to independence etc. That is not that much of a big deal but it lead to beatings from the Spanish recently and approval from the EU.

    The Falklands were settled over 40 years ago when the Islanders clearly stated their preference, allowing the Argentinians to continue their aggressive fantasy is as appropriate as the British suggesting they should take back Israel, Africa & India, someone should have a word with the deluded dolts! The EU are perfectly placed the UN have already ruled on it.

    Can we ask that from now on that the EU support 'British Israel', 'British India', 'Rhodesia' etc? It's only fair!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Yeah it is a massive screw up.

    The Falkland Islanders held a referendum in 2013 and want to remain a self-governing British overseas territory.

    Unfortunately Argentina and others in the region don't recognise the Falkland Islanders rights to self-determination, which is a breach of a UN resolution on peoples right to self determination. While Argentina wants the Falkland Islands other countries don't want Britain's military in the area.

    Leave a comment:


  • JustKeepSwimming
    replied
    Such a stupid blunder.

    I don't think it's actually a big deal, stating both names is common, UN and the US both do it. I don't think it provides any indication of EU members stance on Falklands.

    What is stupid is the EU not realising what Argentina were going to do with this, it was obvious they would spin it and it's a failure of EU diplomacy skills to not see it coming. The reason there is so much talking and lawyers and advisers with diplomacy is to prevent this kind of blunder.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    More loss of sovereignty. We can't prevent the EU from changing the name of our islands!
    hey if the Falkland Islanders want to become Argentinean then we would probably happily pay for the vote. Though currently they have even less chance of voting leave than Scotland. After the EU started getting involved they have probably scared the crop out other marginal states.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    More loss of sovereignty. We can't prevent the EU from changing the name of our islands!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X