Originally posted by ladymuck
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Four days a week, please
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Four days a week, please"
Collapse
-
Isn't that socio-economist'ist? Assuming they are posh enough to drink cappuccino could be deemed offensive.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostWhat you have to do is check with the person you are interacting with what their definition is and then tailor your conversation with that person accordingly. Once everyone understands everyone's individual definition (regardless of whether you agree with it) it's then possible to discuss whether they'd like a dusting of chocolate on their cappuccino.
Leave a comment:
-
ladymuck for PM!!Originally posted by ladymuck View PostWhat you have to do is check with the person you are interacting with what their definition is and then tailor your conversation with that person accordingly. Once everyone understands everyone's individual definition (regardless of whether you agree with it) it's then possible to discuss whether they'd like a dusting of chocolate on their cappuccino.
Leave a comment:
-
What you have to do is check with the person you are interacting with what their definition is and then tailor your conversation with that person accordingly. Once everyone understands everyone's individual definition (regardless of whether you agree with it) it's then possible to discuss whether they'd like a dusting of chocolate on their cappuccino.
Leave a comment:
-
Agreed. There has to be a base definition of something before you go defining other people based on definitions. Now there isn't a single definition for the original woman it's very difficult to discuss and understand anymore.Originally posted by Paralytic View Post
Answering "what is a woman" is not the same as defining other people.
Leave a comment:
-
Stone me, I remember the five and a half day week: early closing day for shops* on a Thursday. 44 hours a week.
*There were regulations re opening hours. Closed completely on Sunday. I remember a chap being prosecuted for refilling his cigarette machine on a Sunday.
Leave a comment:
-
oh I do like a bit of pansexual!Originally posted by tazdevil View Post
Nah still Biological females or a person with XX chromosomes. You can't define biological reality away however woke you are
If people want to think themselves what they're not then that's fine but like all disorders it's probably a mental thing to pretend to be a none binary popty ping or whatever 
Leave a comment:
-
It's true that when working days were reduced from 6 days a week to 5, there were likely similar arguments made about the negative impact it would have on productivity or the economy. However, as you pointed out, we have adjusted to this change and it has become the norm. It's also interesting to note that the "nay sayers" who argue against reducing the workweek don't typically propose a longer workweek, as you mentioned. Instead, they tend to argue that shorter workweeks will lead to reduced productivity or economic growth. However, there is evidence to suggest that working longer hours does not necessarily lead to higher productivity, and that a shorter workweek may actually lead to improved productivity and job satisfaction. Ultimately, it's important to consider the well-being of workers and their ability to maintain a healthy work-life balance, as well as the potential benefits that a shorter workweek could bring.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostI'm sure that when working days went down from 6 days a week to 5, similar arguments were made. Yet here we are. Interesting that the nay sayers don't propose a 6 (or 7) day working week.
Leave a comment:
-
Crickey, dangerous stuff that is. So there is now no longer a definition for a biological human being with two X chromosones, and adult human female, a biological woman that is of the nature to get pregnant or whatever definition it is, there is no longer a term for that distinct group. That's pretty unheard of. We have a name/definition for absolutely everything in the world but now not for a woman that means the desciptions above. That's pretty staggering tbf.Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: