“There are 100 million people around the world who could qualify for protection under our current laws. Let’s be clear. They are coming here.”
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: MOTD
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "MOTD"
Collapse
-
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
During this evening's debate, it seems that 100 million is official UNCHR figure:
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/06/1120542
FTFY.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
The trouble here is that many of the British public are as thick as tulip and take that to be the truth because it was said by someone who is meant to be in a position of responsibility. Remember the 80 million Turkish people who wanted to come to the UK used by the Leave campaign: https://www.channel4.com/news/factch...endum-campaign or even ****** Farage's poster. It's just more lies from the right used to sow hatred and division...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostLike I said, don't confuse propagandist sound bites with reality.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
You're rather a snowflake if you think that's "pressure".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
"
.@GaryLineker
does need to decide though, is he a footie presenter or a candidate for the Labour Party? We discuss on my show tonight on @TalkTV
8pm !"
@NadineDorries
Jacob Rees-Mogg
https://conservativepost.co.uk/time-...cob-rees-mogg/
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
Yes, that is the other side of the argument. I know that all perfetly well thanks.
If you apply it all migrant incomers then it is even fairly valid (although I don't recall seeing the 100 million figure anywhere; given there are only about 62m already here that destroys your credibility somewhat), However apply it to the people in the small boats coming here illegally through a highly dangerous route and ignoring the perfectly valid routes they could have taken and then HMG's position (supported by a huge proportion of the general public; those who don't live in Islington perhaps) are in favour of the proposed actions.
.
Scott Benton, MP for Blackpool South, told the Commons: “Our public services are already creaking under enormous pressure and we simply can’t accept hundreds of millions of people who would no doubt look to come here for a better life. I’m afraid this country is nearly full.”
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
We have never been against immigration of people who want to join us or who are seeking genuine asylum for various reasons (ask all those Ugandan Asians), but that does not mean we mustn't have any kind of control over or vetting of people who do so.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
Which Tory MPs have tried to pressure the BBC in this instance?
"
.@GaryLineker
does need to decide though, is he a footie presenter or a candidate for the Labour Party? We discuss on my show tonight on @TalkTV
8pm !"
@NadineDorries
Jacob Rees-Mogg
https://conservativepost.co.uk/time-...cob-rees-mogg/Last edited by SueEllen; 13 March 2023, 16:24.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
Well stop bumping Gums or blowing your wig. You Dames do get excited. Sounds like you have been on the giggle Juice.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhen you've agreed not to show bias, yes you should keep quiet unless you are prepared to lose your job on principle.
Aunty Beeb can't have its people spouting their views when it has a reputation for impartiality, high profile people like Gary have an impact on this.
Originally posted by d000hg View PostDon't work with them if you aren't willing to do this or think this is immoral.
Originally posted by d000hg View PostMaybe we shouldn't be taking our views on refugees and complex immigration issues from someone who left school with 4 GCSEs to get hit on the head with a football.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: