Originally posted by Qazim2003
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Contractors and work politics
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Contractors and work politics"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Qazim2003 View PostTo the last two people on this thread.
Nothing constructive added to the discussion by you two but thank you for your views on my personality. Now on your bike.
Incidentally, commercial companies might offer SC, but it won't impress any of the government departments or inside the wire companies where it is needed; you will be re-vetted for any such role. All that commercial SC offers is a way past the agent.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qazim2003 View PostTo the last two people on this thread.
Nothing constructive added to the discussion by you two but thank you for your views on my personality. Now on your bike.
Leave a comment:
-
To the last two people on this thread.
Nothing constructive added to the discussion by you two but thank you for your views on my personality. Now on your bike.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qazim2003 View PostThe general feel I get from you all is 'just suck it up and get on with it'. I don't think I will hang about here, will leave as soon as I land another role.
They f'd up my desire to work here and want me to baby sit this volatile team. They also didn't try and bring my SC over still I reminded them. Now I got the previous company telling me my SC was active and this in tell me its inactive.
Thanks for listening folks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qazim2003 View Post
Just to be clear the job description insisted on an SC clearance and it was one of the reason why I strolled into the role. Also one of the factors for why the management might be happy for me to sit around this team as they can't find someone with a clearance to do that role. Now whether it should be needed for this role I am doing or not..... No idea. Not sure what the rules are for these things.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
So you don't need SC at all. In fact it is totally irrelevant to IR work unless you are somehow creating stuff for a government department - and if you were you would not be working there anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
The general feel I get from you all is 'just suck it up and get on with it'. I don't think I will hang about here, will leave as soon as I land another role.
They f'd up my desire to work here and want me to baby sit this volatile team. They also didn't try and bring my SC over still I reminded them. Now I got the previous company telling me my SC was active and this in tell me its inactive.
Thanks for listening folks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qazim2003 View Post
They confirmed to me 3 months into my role that the SC was inactive and just got me to sign a document to say I will not say anything about my work. Working within IR and previously was perm.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
If permis are fighting for your role we assume you are inside then?
Can't blame the perms for trying to push the contractor out. That's understandable. I've been in a ton of roles where the analysts looking to move up the chain would like the role I'm doing but it's rarely a perm role anyway so it's not an option for them. Because of that I've never had situations where I'm being pressured to fight for my work. It's to be expected but you've fallen unlucky that they are actively pressuring you. Bound to happen from time to time though so just part of the game.
I'd say time to move on. It's only going to get worse. This is one of the downsides of contracting, the other is you can just leave when a role becomes untenable. It's going to happen from time to time for one reason or another, crap work, face doesn't fit, conflict, work not as described, IR35 status in jeopardy etc. A decent contractor will put up for a bit IMO, you have got to expect it's tougher being a contractor than a perm but there is a point where it starts to make you miserable so it's time to go.
Has B told you outright your security clearance is no longer valid? Have you spoken to their security team to confirm? Your clearance should have been transfered to them from whoever held it last but it does expire if not used for a period. It also isn't always valid at all gigs. Police might not accept an MOD clearnance and so on. Speak to the client security team who will tell you teh status. If it has lapsed or is no langer valid then there is little point applying for SC gigs anymore. Very very few clients are willing to put contractors back through the process so it can be a very closed shop.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Qazim2003 View PostI have recently become a contractor and prior to that always kept away from work politics. I find myself in an unusual situation where I have become the centre of work politics at my new place and I am finding it very difficult to handle.
First 6 months I have come and and delivered work beyond anyone's expectations and a lot of promising feedback was coming my way.
1 more month on and a new delivery lead and an individual, vying for the role I currently hold, are colluding to push me to the sidelines. E.g keeping me out loop for conversations which I should be a part of for my work, pushing my tasks to this individual wanting my role, almost not speaking to me! It is stopping me from doing my job and is effectively making me look redundant.
Is this common or have I just been unlucky?
Can't blame the perms for trying to push the contractor out. That's understandable. I've been in a ton of roles where the analysts looking to move up the chain would like the role I'm doing but it's rarely a perm role anyway so it's not an option for them. Because of that I've never had situations where I'm being pressured to fight for my work. It's to be expected but you've fallen unlucky that they are actively pressuring you. Bound to happen from time to time though so just part of the game.
I'd say time to move on. It's only going to get worse. This is one of the downsides of contracting, the other is you can just leave when a role becomes untenable. It's going to happen from time to time for one reason or another, crap work, face doesn't fit, conflict, work not as described, IR35 status in jeopardy etc. A decent contractor will put up for a bit IMO, you have got to expect it's tougher being a contractor than a perm but there is a point where it starts to make you miserable so it's time to go.
Has B told you outright your security clearance is no longer valid? Have you spoken to their security team to confirm? Your clearance should have been transfered to them from whoever held it last but it does expire if not used for a period. It also isn't always valid at all gigs. Police might not accept an MOD clearnance and so on. Speak to the client security team who will tell you teh status. If it has lapsed or is no langer valid then there is little point applying for SC gigs anymore. Very very few clients are willing to put contractors back through the process so it can be a very closed shop.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View Post
He is, actually, at least for government and related clients. Revealing you have clearance is a breach of the OSA. You're not even supposed to wear your pass outside a secure area (yeah, I know, tell it to the many knobs around Whitehall).
Finance and the other commercials can do what they like.
he's pathologically incapable of 'don't post'
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sadkingbilly View Post
yeh, - right!
https://assets.publishing.service.go...Networking.pdf
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Yesterday 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: