Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Britain somehow managed (better than now too) before “OBR” was created - using same models as the Treasury, I think a dozen of staff work there - same or better analysis can be done by at least a dozen of large banks/funds
Britain somehow managed (better than now too) before “OBR” was created - using same models as the Treasury, I think a dozen of staff work there - same or better analysis can be done by at least a dozen of large banks/funds
Totally irrelevant - it's all about the optics. Just let them do their job - if you don't, it rather draws attention to the fact that you might be trying to hide something.
Britain somehow managed (better than now too) before “OBR” was created - using same models as the Treasury, I think a dozen of staff work there - same or better analysis can be done by at least a dozen of large banks/funds
I don't think the markets care one jot about IR35. They probably don't care about the 19% personal tax rate either. It was the rash rash of dramatic cuts tossed out with no forethought and the refusal to have them 'audited'.
I didn't imply the did. They care about the aggregate numbers, not what they relate or amount to individually, as do the OBR. That much is obvious. As I've said elsewhere, the failure to have OBR check their work was a major issue too, which has now been fixed and now matters w/r to these reversals.
We all know that. But that is not the metric here. The metric is whether it can be squared with OBR (and, hence, the markets).
I don't think the markets care one jot about IR35. They probably don't care about the 19% personal tax rate either. It was the rash rash of dramatic cuts tossed out with no forethought and the refusal to have them 'audited'.
But it's £2bn and the incremental effects of a bunch of smaller measures were quite large, plus the average Joe either doesn't understand it or works in an office with IT contractors and looks at them as "scumbag tax avoiders". Just read the comments in the FT any time there's an article on IR35
Yet the average joe has no issue with self employed traders taking cash payments . And not declaring it.
It's not even £2bn in truth, it's more like a loss all things considered. As HMT have been told on numerous occasions: it seems we have another chancellor who is driven by the Treasury civil service rather than harsh reality.
We all know that. But that is not the metric here. The metric is whether it can be squared with OBR (and, hence, the markets).
But it's £2bn and the incremental effects of a bunch of smaller measures were quite large, plus the average Joe either doesn't understand it or works in an office with IT contractors and looks at them as "scumbag tax avoiders". Just read the comments in the FT any time there's an article on IR35
It's not even £2bn in truth, it's more like a loss all things considered. As HMT have been told on numerous occasions: it seems we have another chancellor who is driven by the Treasury civil service rather than harsh reality.
Well, I just got my letter from HMRC ref my state pension. Lucky I'm not just relying on it...£8,898 a year. Now if £2500 minimum of that was just going on heating?
The state pension is only vaguely viable to live off if there are two of you in a couple receiving it. Most of the big outgoings like heating, electricity, water, running a car etc are pretty much the same whether there's one person or two in a household.
Leave a comment: