Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: New Dr Who announced
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "New Dr Who announced"
Collapse
-
So a thread about a black actor ends up arguing about how we treat immigrants and refugees. Hmm.
Leave a comment:
-
It's a false dichotomy. It's not one or the other. We can help the homeless, ex-service people already here AND bring in more people who need help. But the government chooses not to. (Not that you'd ever get all the homeless of the streets, well, not without some kind of rather totalitarian action like putting them in prison).
Usually the people who say "we should help our own first" don't lift a finger to do that either. I had a long chat with a guy who was saying how unfair it is that people are taking Ukrainians into their homes, but didn't when the Syrians or Afghans came. Eventually it came out that he'd never take anyone into his home anyway - he was just against what he called "virtue signalling". Of course it isn't that, as virtue signalling is making a meaningless gesture that costs you nothing, in order to have other people think you're wonderful.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostWe have 200K+ homeless about half are foreign born but many are ex services. Maybe we should do something about those before bringing in more?
Send them all home. Start with the Anglo-Saxons. And the Anglo-philes. Keep the British Isles for British people.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View Post
Migrants want to go to places where they can communicate with the locals. Do you know what % of the world has English as their first or second language, compared to say, French or German?
Do you think we should ship Ukrainians off to Rwanda because Boris & his chums are no longer getting funds direct from Russia?
I don't care where economic migrants WANT to go, I do know I don't want them here illegally if you are willing to pay for illegals then get your money out.
Just because economic migrants watched "die hard" etc. at home and learnt English doesn't mean we should let them into the UK illegally. We have 200K+ homeless about half are foreign born but many are ex services. Maybe we should do something about those before bringing in more?
Leave a comment:
-
In other news, Kenneth Williams and Charles Hawtrey being cast in the 1960s, demonstrate that the woke culture has been here for many decades.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
no by making sure they don't have a right to settle here based on their now criminal actions I know Macaroon is bad but surely not that bad they want to risk their lives to be ruled by Boris?
This means that they won't pay to be trafficked on dangerous dinghies. If you want dead migrants go ahead and encourage the channel route.
Do you think we should ship Ukrainians off to Rwanda because Boris & his chums are no longer getting funds direct from Russia?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostYes, why not?
If you want dead migrants, but don't want them to die within sight of the UK, ship them to a country known for massacring its own population.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WTFH View Post
By sending them to Rwanda?
This means that they won't pay to be trafficked on dangerous dinghies. If you want dead migrants go ahead and encourage the channel route.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: