• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Putin gone (We wish)"

Collapse

  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post

    That may be so in theory. But missile launch sites in NATO countries present a belligerent aspect, especially when practically on the Russian border hardly 100 miles from Moscow, and at the best of times that is enough to put the wind up someone as paranoid as Putin!
    400 miles. Go to Google maps, right click on Moscow select measure distance.
    Back to the subject, during the cold war the one thing that stopped an invasion in the Baltic Region was the vast dense forests. It would have slowed down the Russian tanks too much. It is far better to employ tank defences rather than relying on nukes.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    3 is a nonsense. NATO is a purely defensive organisation, not a belligerent. If it has a proactive aspect, it is purely to act as a deterrent. Fear of it is only needed if you intend attacking one of its member states first.
    That may be so in theory. But missile launch sites in NATO countries present a belligerent aspect, especially when practically on the Russian border hardly 100 miles from Moscow, and at the best of times that is enough to put the wind up someone as paranoid as Putin!

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    6 Extended exercise for Russian troops, to keep them mean and keen and up to scratch, instead of moping about bored in Russia!

    No seriously, mostly 3 I reckon, along with the wheat and fertiliser (all of which will increase the dependency on Russia of India, China, _and_ let's not forget countries in North Africa, where Russia is also trying to increase its presence and influence)
    3 is a nonsense. NATO is a purely defensive organisation, not a belligerent. If it has a proactive aspect, it is purely to act as a deterrent. Fear of it is only needed if you intend attacking one of its member states first.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post

    1 and 5 mainly, with a side order of 2
    6 Extended exercise for Russian troops, to keep them mean and keen and up to scratch, instead of moping about bored in Russia!

    No seriously, mostly 3 I reckon, along with the wheat and fertiliser (all of which will increase the dependency on Russia of India, China, _and_ let's not forget countries in North Africa, where Russia is also trying to increase its presence and influence)

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post

    What do you reckon his real motivation is?
    1. recreation of some form of Soviet Empire
    2. won't accept Ukraine as independent country, unless it has a government which kowtows to Russia
    3. genuine fear of further NATO expansion
    4. ridding Ukraine of Nazi and drug addict leadership
    5. narcissistic attention seeking
    1 and 5 mainly, with a side order of 2

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post

    What do you reckon his real motivation is?
    1. recreation of some form of Soviet Empire
    2. won't accept Ukraine as independent country, unless it has a government which kowtows to Russia
    3. genuine fear of further NATO expansion
    4. ridding Ukraine of Nazi and drug addict leadership
    5. narcissistic attention seeking
    If he had a "fear" of NATO expansion he would have done something about Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania the first time he was in power.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    He invated Ukraine in 2014 - 8 years ago, he would have taken whole country if it was not for volunteers and a handful of able military units to start fighting back and only ferocity of such fighting stopped him where he was back then, he decided to wait and prepare better for the next time, which is now.
    This is better prepared

    Including sending your army into the mud? Wasn't that a WWI mistake?

    Leave a comment:


  • DealorNoDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    He invated Ukraine in 2014 - 8 years ago, he would have taken whole country if it was not for volunteers and a handful of able military units to start fighting back and only ferocity of such fighting stopped him where he was back then, he decided to wait and prepare better for the next time, which is now.
    What do you reckon his real motivation is?
    1. recreation of some form of Soviet Empire
    2. won't accept Ukraine as independent country, unless it has a government which kowtows to Russia
    3. genuine fear of further NATO expansion
    4. ridding Ukraine of Nazi and drug addict leadership
    5. narcissistic attention seeking

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post
    Why invade now?
    He invated Ukraine in 2014 - 8 years ago, he would have taken whole country if it was not for volunteers and a handful of able military units to start fighting back and only ferocity of such fighting stopped him where he was back then, he decided to wait and prepare better for the next time, which is now.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Wow. If these guys are the professionals, it's good job they didn't send conscripts.
    Sadly they are still some mothers sons. Mainly innocent personally.

    Leave a comment:


  • DealorNoDeal
    replied
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post

    I read that his most of his inner circle consists of his KGB mates from the 1970s who all think the same as him i.e. - reestablish the USSR [or Russia 2.0].
    I suspect this is the real agenda. And making his mark before it's too late (assuming he is ill).

    If former Soviet republics joining NATO was seen as such a threat, why didn't he do something about it years ago?

    Why invade now?

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Wow. If these guys are the professionals, it's good job they didn't send conscripts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Putin the liar


    Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday said he will not send conscripts or reservists to fight in Ukraine and that "professional" soldiers fulfilling "fixed objectives" were leading the war.

    "Conscripted soldiers are not participating and will not participate in the fighting. There will not be an additional conscription of reservists either," Putin said in a televised address marking International Women's Day on March 8.
    https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/...ukraine-a76812

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post

    II doubt anyone else will have access to him to get that close.
    Air hostesses.

    Though they all clearly try not to look creeped out when he stands or sits up close to them.

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Originally posted by DeadEyedJacks View Post
    Seems more likely than one of his inner circle getting close enough for an assassination.
    I read that his most of his inner circle consists of his KGB mates from the 1970s who all think the same as him i.e. - reestablish the USSR.

    Outside of that you have the Oligarchs who Mad Vlad has made very rich, so not much luck there. I doubt anyone else will have access to him to get that close.

    qh
    Last edited by quackhandle; 7 March 2022, 18:38.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X