• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "You thought the Government were bad..."

Collapse

  • Zigenare
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why won't anyone tell us, does Dame Cressida Dick or not?
    She ticked two diversity boxes, can you guess which ones?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post

    Google translates as : no swelling

    James Brown doesn't cause you to swell? I'm sure he is pleased about that!

    I'm guessing it means no bruising so the hit didn't land?

    My mind went to this:

    Sorry V, nice try, but no banana.

    tumōrōsus (adj) = swollen, inflated, bloated
    nemo = no one, nobody
    and actually is a contraction of the old Latin ne hemō (“no man”), hey, look no apostrophe, how did they manage?

    So in the context of the above means a "bloated nobody".

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post

    nemo tumōrōsus
    Google translates as : no swelling

    James Brown doesn't cause you to swell? I'm sure he is pleased about that!

    I'm guessing it means no bruising so the hit didn't land?

    My mind went to this:

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Why won't anyone tell us, does Dame Cressida Dick or not?
    She doesn't "do" she "is"...

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Why won't anyone tell us, does Dame Cressida Dick or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Oddly this appeared in my time line.

    So there was no-one available to replace her in time.

    However they are now looking for her replacement.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-60229473.amp

    There was tension between the home secretary and Downing Street over whether to try to recruit a successor for Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick in the wake of the controversy over the Sarah Everard case, multiple sources have told the BBC.
    Priti Patel and No 10 both had concerns about leadership at the Met, and discussed whether or not to try to find a new commissioner.

    There was widespread anger over the force's handling of the case and the treatment of female protestors holding a vigil for Ms Everard, who was killed by a former Met officer Wayne Couzens.

    But it's understood that both Ms Patel and Boris Johnson were unenthusiastic about the likely internal candidate, senior Met officer Neil Basu, who had previously criticised the PM's comments and was seen in No 10 as "too political", sources say.

    However, the home secretary did consider going through the recruitment process where a civil service panel interviews candidates, before recommending the candidate to her.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by Paralytic View Post

    The same applies to our government, so we should not be surprised that it is not be any different for the Met.
    Why? Politicians are skilled in one thing - getting elected. Competency, job knowledge or expertise in any area are not requirements.

    We - or at least, most thinking people - rather expect our policemen to have rather more detailed training for the job they are paid to do. When the Met's most senior officer is concerned about "prejudicing" a summary infraction, it's clear they don't count knowledge of the law too highly. Nor common sense, come to that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

    You seem to want to be treated like a child, so I'm going to pat you on the head and say "yes, darling".

    But speaking to you as an adult,
    nemo tumōrōsus

    Leave a comment:


  • Paralytic
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    It says a lot for the met and the police "service" in general that there is nobody out there capable of replacing a totally out of her depth incumbent.
    The same applies to our government, so we should not be surprised that it is not be any different for the Met.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    That was months ago.

    It says a lot for the met and the police "service" in general that there is nobody out there capable of replacing a totally out of her depth incumbent.

    They did look at an Aussie but he got quarantined...

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Isn't the Met owned by Sadiq Khan, and always has been?
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...t-police-chief

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by TwoWolves View Post
    We should be worrying about the corrupt officers and the institutional "blind-eye" shown to some forms of crime. This is just trivial in comparison.
    A good organisation should stop both. This sort of misbehaviour is obviously endemic

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Convenient timing this comes out just as the Met are in the public eye over #10.

    Leave a comment:


  • PCTNN
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    and I believe many young people generally joke about rapes and knives these days.
    And do you find this acceptable?

    I'd be mortified and would feel like a failure if my kids did that.

    Leave a comment:


  • TwoWolves
    replied
    We should be worrying about the corrupt officers and the institutional "blind-eye" shown to some forms of crime. This is just trivial in comparison.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X