• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Mutiny in Swindon

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Mutiny in Swindon"

Collapse

  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by hobnob View Post
    The train company's logic seems pretty odd there: they didn't want to stop at Swindon because the train was full. I've seen buses do something similar, i.e. if nobody presses the bell to get off then the driver won't stop to pick anyone up. However, if people do want to get off then the driver will stop and then let on a corresponding number of people. I realise that it's a bit more tricky on a train (e.g. you'd probably need station staff to keep new passengers back) but refusing to let people off doesn't seem like a great plan. Aside from anything else, it's just going to cause unnecessary crowding on another train, if they have to make an extra journey in the opposite direction.
    If Thameslink used this logic their trains trains would never stop at Herne Hill in the mornings ... every train through there is jammed .... always a fun station to transfer at

    Leave a comment:


  • hobnob
    replied
    The train company's logic seems pretty odd there: they didn't want to stop at Swindon because the train was full. I've seen buses do something similar, i.e. if nobody presses the bell to get off then the driver won't stop to pick anyone up. However, if people do want to get off then the driver will stop and then let on a corresponding number of people. I realise that it's a bit more tricky on a train (e.g. you'd probably need station staff to keep new passengers back) but refusing to let people off doesn't seem like a great plan. Aside from anything else, it's just going to cause unnecessary crowding on another train, if they have to make an extra journey in the opposite direction.

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    It would depend on how far it got down the track as the red light would have been shown to the oncoming train if not past 2x lights

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Blimey, didn't know trains were allowed to reverse to be fair. Must have been a logistical nightmare that.

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Most people do what ever they can to avoid Swindon, not the other way round!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    started a topic Mutiny in Swindon

    Mutiny in Swindon

    OK who do we know in the sticks?

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...p-Swindon.html

    Rail passengers launch 'mutiny' and forced train to REVERSE after their Great Western Railway service failed to stop at scheduled station
    • Passengers activated emergency alarms onboard London-bound train last night
    • Those onboard were frustrated the train had not called at intended stop Swindon
    • Driver took train back to Swindon before passengers were kicked off at Reading

Working...
X