• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Royals gone Woke

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Royals gone Woke"

Collapse

  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post

    And possibly her alleged paedo middle son wanting to play Lord Admiral of the High Seas for a day, may have also crossed her mind.

    qh
    Fancying 17 year old women hardly counts as being a paedo (unless you're in battulip crazy America, where you can buy a semi-automatic rifle in a supermarket but can't have sex legally until you are 18 ! )

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Originally posted by SimonMac View Post

    I'm guessing the biggest driver is the Queen wanting the day to be about her husband, not what anyone is wearing, pick your battles and all that
    And possibly her alleged paedo middle son wanting to play Lord Admiral of the High Seas for a day, may have also crossed her mind.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • SimonMac
    replied
    Originally posted by ladymuck View Post
    I'm hesistant to believe that it's all about Harry. The media will spin it to whatever agenda they've got going on this week. If the family did decide to not wear the formal military dress because of Harry then that is a shame, as they have the right to wear them. They also have the right to choose to wear civilian dress.

    Anyway, it's good to see what men wear getting a decent level of scrutiny for a change. Usually this level of nitpicking over what someone is wearing is reserved for women.
    I'm guessing the biggest driver is the Queen wanting the day to be about her husband, not what anyone is wearing, pick your battles and all that

    Leave a comment:


  • ladymuck
    replied
    I'm hesistant to believe that it's all about Harry. The media will spin it to whatever agenda they've got going on this week. If the family did decide to not wear the formal military dress because of Harry then that is a shame, as they have the right to wear them. They also have the right to choose to wear civilian dress.

    Anyway, it's good to see what men wear getting a decent level of scrutiny for a change. Usually this level of nitpicking over what someone is wearing is reserved for women.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    So none of them are wearing uniform because prince 'under the thumb' can't by choice of his actions! I wouldn't be surprised if Fergie is invited now even though the DoE wouldn't grant her an audience.
    Gotta say the whole thing pisses me off. If you've served and you have a right to wear a uniform then you should. In a position of leadership as well so should wear it to respect others in the service. Should be mandatory IMO, not an option to not offend the few that have have stabbed you in the back. I'm all for modernising some out of date traditions but if you are in service you should proudly wear it.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by saptastic View Post
    We will all know the "real" story in a few months when Meghan signs an exclusive interview deal with CBS "The truth behind the funeral - and the real reason why I was not invited and how poor Harry was treated whilst in the UK"
    She's about 7 months pregnant.

    You aren't suppose to go on long haul flights - which US to UK is - when you are that far gone.

    Short haul you can continue flying until 8 months unless you are at high risk.

    Regardless if you are showing lots of airlines want you to have a letter from a doctor to say you are unlikely to go into labour on their flight.

    On and if she had given birth until the baby was up to 12 months old she would also have a good excuse to not attend the funeral during this pandemic.

    Leave a comment:


  • saptastic
    replied
    We will all know the "real" story in a few months when Meghan signs an exclusive interview deal with CBS "The truth behind the funeral - and the real reason why I was not invited and how poor Harry was treated whilst in the UK"

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Younger than 16?

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Not only, apparently Andrew was considering turning up in an Admiral's uniform even though he isn't. This was probably the last straw.
    I think ******* young children was the last straw tbh.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Not only, apparently Andrew was considering turning up in an Admiral's uniform even though he isn't. This was probably the last straw.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    started a topic Royals gone Woke

    Royals gone Woke

    So none of them are wearing uniform because prince 'under the thumb' can't by choice of his actions! I wouldn't be surprised if Fergie is invited now even though the DoE wouldn't grant her an audience.

Working...
X