• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "MVL and transfer of funds to Insolvency Practitioner...norm or risky?"

Collapse

  • Clarke Bell
    replied
    Originally posted by johnsommers View Post
    Folks.

    planning to call it a day on my limited company and following MVL route.
    however, my IP is asking for funds to be transferred to her business account.
    Company has no liabilities pending, and disbursements are to director herself mainly.

    so question - it is a standard practice to transfer entire funds to IP and then get appropriate amount back?

    I hope someone can provide genuine information to help me decide whether to transfer or not.

    thanks.
    Yes, this is normal practice from an IP...with the funds being held in a client account.

    And I agree about doing the due-diligence, and making sure you are dealing with an IP who is regulated and experienced with doing MVLs.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnsommers
    replied
    Originally posted by Uncle Albert View Post

    You'd trust your money to anyone who posts here?
    I guess one has to draw the line somewhere, and then there is fate

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Albert
    replied
    Originally posted by johnsommers View Post

    Thanks Cojak, what would qualify as being careful and performing due diligence?
    So far due-deligence
    1)IP is on IP register.
    2)IP has Bond to cover eventualities
    3)IP has been recommended by my accountant, as per them they been recommending him for ages now.
    4)IP and his company been active on this forum too.

    not sure what else can be done as part of due-deligence.
    You'd trust your money to anyone who posts here?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    QC’s opinion would go down nicely

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by johnsommers View Post

    Thanks Cojak, what would qualify as being careful and performing due diligence?
    So far due-deligence
    1)IP is on IP register.
    2)IP has Bond to cover eventualities
    3)IP has been recommended by my accountant, as per them they been recommending him for ages now.
    4)IP and his company been active on this forum too.

    not sure what else can be done as part of due-deligence.
    That's it really, as well as recommendations.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    (sucks air through teeth) All I am saying is rather you than me fella.

    Leave a comment:


  • johnsommers
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Yes it is normal, which is why you must be very careful in choosing your Practitioner and perform due diligence on them.
    Thanks Cojak, what would qualify as being careful and performing due diligence?
    So far due-deligence
    1)IP is on IP register.
    2)IP has Bond to cover eventualities
    3)IP has been recommended by my accountant, as per them they been recommending him for ages now.
    4)IP and his company been active on this forum too.

    not sure what else can be done as part of due-deligence.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    You wouldn't normally transfer the funds yourself, as this removes much of the protection - though some IPs might ask you to if you are in a hurry (at your risk of course).

    Instead, during the MVL, normally the IP would take control of the bank account and they would then carry out the necessary transfers.

    Alternatively you could use an insolvency firm that allows you to retain control of the company funds by way of director loans, negating the need for the liquidator to take control.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Maybe, but it's totally safe to send money to one of the posters on here, as long as they have at least 60000 posts under their belt.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Yes it is normal, which is why you must be very careful in choosing your Practitioner and perform due diligence on them.

    Leave a comment:


  • MVL and transfer of funds to Insolvency Practitioner...norm or risky?

    Folks.

    planning to call it a day on my limited company and following MVL route.
    however, my IP is asking for funds to be transferred to her business account.
    Company has no liabilities pending, and disbursements are to director herself mainly.

    so question - it is a standard practice to transfer entire funds to IP and then get appropriate amount back?

    I hope someone can provide genuine information to help me decide whether to transfer or not.

    thanks.

Working...
X