- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Not politically correct census question
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Not politically correct census question"
Collapse
-
Maybe the idiot who designed the form missed it off. Like those who make forms that cannot handle a space in your postcode?
-
As my good friend used to say - if my aunty had bollocks she'd be my uncle. Oh wait...Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhat if they don't identify as either, which is far more trendy these days?
Leave a comment:
-
Animals can have different genders (apparently). So you can identify as a cat but the cat you identify as has a gender.Originally posted by Fraidycat View Post
And what about those who don't identify as humans but other animals eg. Cats (like me) or even Fictional Creatures like Elves.
Where do you draw the line??
Leave a comment:
-
And what about those who don't identify as humans but other animals eg. Cats (like me) or even Fictional Creatures like Elves.Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhat if they don't identify as either, which is far more trendy these days?
Where do you draw the line??
Leave a comment:
-
But he said it was cis-centric - that's the point I tongue in cheek described as transphobic. No point missed, thank you. And yes, it is a bit odd. (Although it's not about adopted children, it's step children -adopted children are legally sons and daughters).Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
You're missing the point, and have completely derailed the thread by the look of it with all that gender identifying crap.
AFAICS, the OP was simply asking why the form asks the sex of biological offspring but not for adopted children.
Leave a comment:
-
You're missing the point, and have completely derailed the thread by the look of it with all that gender identifying crap.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostOh dear. You transphobe. If your child identifies as a girl, then she's a girl, even if born male. Not cis-centric at all.
Or, more likely, they're collecting important demographic information, where identity politics has no say.
AFAICS, the OP was simply asking why the form asks the sex of biological offspring but not for adopted children.
Leave a comment:
-
Not exactly.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostFFS you are all being "woke"
But I do strongly believe that people should be free to so whatever they want, with whoever they, whenever they want, and do to their own bides whatever they want. And not be abused, harmed, or otherwise prevented, except where it prevents another person from doing all the above (except during a pandemic as that would be stupid).
Jennifer whatever her name is, who sued the waxing place for refusing to wax her balls was bang out of order.
The 6' 90kg cyclist who was born a man, still shaves and beats women in cycle races is also bang out of order.
Leave a comment:
-
*ahem* ONS backs down on 'what is your sex?' Census legal dispute (archive.is)Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
66,499,999 people didn't bat an eyelid at the question
1 bitched about it.
Lets change it... er nope.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh I'm sorry. I assumed your post was so dumb that you'd not actually meant it. Unless... this is an intricate double bluff, in which case well done. You got me.Originally posted by Lance View Post
Ahh. You mean that I was wrong. But rather than point that out (which I accept on reflection), you decided to lazily use the tired insult of calling everyone racist/sexist/facist/phobic. You have demonstrated the lack of debate and thought that so-called cancel culture is accused of doing.
Leave a comment:
-
66,499,999 people didn't bat an eyelid at the questionOriginally posted by Lance View PostA 3rd person living in my house.
It's my daughter.
Option is "son or daughter". Why not "child". Why this cis-centric question.
The option for a stepchild is simply "stepchild". Why does their gender not matter?
1 bitched about it.
Lets change it... er nope.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: