Reply to: Contractor tax cheats

[Mordac]

I've just come across a right muppet and cheat who has been contracting for the last 3 years and has some how managed to get away with getting paid directly into his personal bank account. Though in theory allowed and still possible to manage your company financial lin this way, somehow I doubt he's paying the right tax.

He's probably not the first. At the last place another guy used to insist on cheques made payable to his company which was conveniently called FIRSTNAME LASTNAME LTD and openly admitted to having the freedom to cash them wherever he likes.

My question is simple, how do these people get away with it? Don't HMRC have systems where known big agencies have to enter data about which companies they are paying so that signals can go off when those companies declare zero income? If not, why tf not?!?

Go Nad!

[northernladuk]

I've just come across a right muppet and cheat who has been contracting for the last 3 years and has some how managed to get away with getting paid directly into his personal bank account. Though in theory allowed and still possible to manage your company financial lin this way, somehow I doubt he's paying the right tax.
?

Weren't you in a scheme and not paying the right tax?

[eek]

Like nurses who used a loan scheme, after it was heavily promoted to them by their agency.

Only after the agency did a complete runner...

[NotAllThere]

HMRC have no time for small one man contracting firms charging 300 quid a day rate. They have bigger fish to fry.

Like nurses who used a loan scheme, after it was heavily promoted to them by their agency.

[BlasterBates]

Rees-Mogg is a minnow you buffoon, you just have a hang-up because he's a Tory MP.

An ordinary bloke, a man of the people as they say.

[AtW]

Indeed and now Jacob Rees-Mogg and his mates are gaming the system. They do it on a bigger scale though.

They write the rules they game

[TwoWolves]

Indeed and now Jacob Rees-Mogg and his mates are gaming the system. They do it on a bigger scale though.

Rees-Mogg is a minnow you buffoon, you just have a hang-up because he's a Tory MP.

[BlasterBates]

I contracted in Investment Banking for over 20 years, the whole system is bent to a mind-boggling degree. I got a ring-side seat to events in 2007/8 where powerful people filled their boots in plain sight and the press essentially covered it up and a Labour government assisted the crooks.

Grow-up and forget about the small fry.

Indeed and now Jacob Rees-Mogg and his mates are gaming the system. They do it on a bigger scale though.

[TwoWolves]

I contracted in Investment Banking for over 20 years, the whole system is bent to a mind-boggling degree. I got a ring-side seat to events in 2007/8 where powerful people filled their boots in plain sight and the press essentially covered it up and a Labour government assisted the crooks.

Grow-up and forget about the small fry.

[BlasterBates]

Using your own bank account is fine, I did it in the past.

[Paddy]

I've just come across a right muppet and cheat who has been contracting for the last 3 years and has some how managed to get away with getting paid directly into his personal bank account. Though in theory allowed and still possible to manage your company financial lin this way, somehow I doubt he's paying the right tax.

He's probably not the first. At the last place another guy used to insist on cheques made payable to his company which was conveniently called FIRSTNAME LASTNAME LTD and openly admitted to having the freedom to cash them wherever he likes.

My question is simple, how do these people get away with it? Don't HMRC have systems where known big agencies have to enter data about which companies they are paying so that signals can go off when those companies declare zero income? If not, why tf not?!?

Calling your company FIRSTNAME LASTNAME LTD is quite common. Getting paid by cheques or even cash is not illegal. Furthermore, it is not unlawful to get paid into a private bank account for a limited company. The payments will be held on trust and must be declared to HMRC. The downside is that it leaves his/her private bank account open to scrutiny. There are difficulties opening bank accounts for limited companies and he chose to do in that way. He has not done anything unlawful. However, by you calling him/her a cheat opens yourself for an action damages for liable even if you don't name him. The mere fact that he could read your post and be identified is enough to sue you personally. I suggest you retract your allegations.

[wattaj]

I've just come across a right muppet and cheat who has been contracting for the last 3 years and has some how managed to get away with getting paid directly into his personal bank account. Though in theory allowed and still possible to manage your company financial lin this way, somehow I doubt he's paying the right tax.

He's probably not the first. At the last place another guy used to insist on cheques made payable to his company which was conveniently called FIRSTNAME LASTNAME LTD and openly admitted to having the freedom to cash them wherever he likes.

My question is simple, how do these people get away with it? Don't HMRC have systems where known big agencies have to enter data about which companies they are paying so that signals can go off when those companies declare zero income? If not, why tf not?!?

So, and in summary, you have no evidence of impropriety, but are nonetheless aggrieved by something or other.

Good post; well played.

[vetran]

HMRC have no time for small one man contracting firms charging 300 quid a day rate. They have bigger fish to fry. Their main focus is on corporates like Amazon dodging tax as well as Dutch Antilles registered remuneration schemes which promise 100% retention.

Yeah because they provide better free lunches.

[fullyautomatix]

HMRC have no time for small one man contracting firms charging 300 quid a day rate. They have bigger fish to fry. Their main focus is on corporates like Amazon dodging tax as well as Dutch Antilles registered remuneration schemes which promise 100% retention.

[SueEllen]

even if you give them a ring they are unlikely to do anything out of sheer incompetence

They won't do anything because they cut the number of VAT inspectors who use to pick up on this type of fraud.

I was told when I started contracting in the 00s that I should expect a VAT inspection at some point by other contractors, self-employed people and even the ex-VAT inspectors I did a free HMRC course with. I've never had an inspection and they put all HMRC courses online...