• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Doom London Tier 2 from Saturday"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Are you saying dogging is still allowed.
    Are you asking for a "friend"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I think the safe Covid sex advice is to wear masks and face away from each others faces.
    govt. is encouraging doggy position

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I think the safe Covid sex advice is to wear masks and face away from each others faces.
    Reverse cowgirl it is then...

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    Are you saying dogging is still allowed.
    I think the safe Covid sex advice is to wear masks and face away from each others faces.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Your post is incorrect they can meet outdoors and in cars, if they socially distance.

    Are you saying dogging is still allowed.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
    Seems like couples who don't live together can't meet now.

    Coronavirus UK: Couples in hotspots BANNED from meeting indoors | Daily Mail Online

    Still, presume it's all right for men who have 2m long thingies.
    Your post is incorrect they can meet outdoors and in cars, if they socially distance.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    Seems like couples who don't live together can't meet now.

    Coronavirus UK: Couples in hotspots BANNED from meeting indoors | Daily Mail Online

    Still, presume it's all right for men who have 2m long thingies.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    They won't answer anyone's questions from here as they never answer questions anyway they just waffle round them.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    So come on, you know you want to: Ask a minister a question about coronavirus - GOV.UK

    Leave a comment:


  • dsc
    replied
    Originally posted by jayn200 View Post
    Yes but they absolutely did not shut down their economy in any way, they still suffered a gdp reduction due to lower exports because of other countries but otherwise domestically had a minimal decline.

    All while having similar health impact to other european countries with similar demographics.
    I'm fairly sure I read somewhere that they suffered the same as Denmark (which did lockdown) in terms of people stopping spending.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by rogerfederer View Post
    Untrue. The virus is so obviously airborne and capable of lingering around. An indoors venue with strangers, with or without aircon, is the perfect way to spread it around.

    The key here is that the original strategy of 'herd immunity' is still being attempted, despite evidence being inconclusive on this being possible. If the virus mutates - as is believed (current Lancet magazine, BMJ too) - then it is plausible someone who caught it in February can now catch it again and not just brush it off as a minor second infection.

    Exposure time seems to matter. If you brush past someone and somehow are exposed to it via air, or perhaps on a surface, that's considered a small dosing. If you're talking to an infected person for 3 hours over pints then your viral exposure is higher and the illness likely to be worse.

    Given how ubiquitous alcohol is here in shops I don't see the need to support pubs now and would rather help the economy in other ways.
    "Over the last 6 months I've been reading a lot of regurgitated unsourced crap on the internet, combined with a delusion that I am in some way intelligent I'm going to... " blahh blahh blahh.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by PCTNN View Post
    Won't change much.

    People will still meet up outdoors.

    There need to be more deaths for people to start behaving appropriately. Give it a couple of months.
    Probably what's more important now is number of hospitalisations, rather than deaths, which are still, relatively, low.

    Leave a comment:


  • PCTNN
    replied
    Originally posted by dsc View Post
    Again, how is this going to be enforced?
    It cannot be enforced. It relies (it has to rely) on the common sense of the citizens and the trust they have in their governments.

    Which is why countries like Sweden are doing OK and country of a-holes like uk and us are doing poorly.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by jayn200 View Post
    Yes but they absolutely did not shut down their economy in any way, they still suffered a gdp reduction due to lower exports because of other countries but otherwise domestically had a minimal decline.

    All while having similar health impact to other european countries with similar demographics.
    Your last statement is false.

    They had the highest number of deaths per 100,000 of population of any Nordic country. Like the UK they didn't test all suspected Covid cases and didn't hospitalise those with "mild' infections as their health service was over run.

    And they also had the biggest Q2 GDP fall of any Nordic country. Coronavirus: Sweden GDP falls 8.6% in Q2, more than Nordic neighbors - Business Insider


    If you want to hold up islands who did well , as the UK consists of islands, look at New Zealand and Japan.

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by jayn200 View Post
    Yes but they absolutely did not shut down their economy in any way, they still suffered a gdp reduction due to lower exports because of other countries but otherwise domestically had a minimal decline.

    All while having similar health impact to other european countries with similar demographics.
    Have you evidence to back up your repeated claims?
    Last time you claimed Sweden had done it right, you were presented with evidence that proved you were wrong, so why are you repeating your falsehoods?

    Edit, here's the posts: https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post2811286

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X