Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Women's clothing sizes
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Women's clothing sizes"
Collapse
-
In this day and age it certainly isn't....Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostThat is a question for science.
Leave a comment:
-
That is a question for science.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostMordy is a woman?
Leave a comment:
-
Alternatively, nobody working in a Bangladeshi sweat shop on 30p a day has the faintest idea how fat western women actually are.Originally posted by wattaj View PostI think that it's called "vanity sizing". All shops have their own take on this dependant on their customer demographics.
(Getting ready to run away now...)
Leave a comment:
-
Actually that would fit me - I'm 'blessed' with a big arse and a narrow waist, I need to wear belts or they would be baggy around the top (I used to have a Turkish tailor I would go to in London, who would adjust my new clothes to fit - I miss him...)Originally posted by DealorNoDeal View PostAll three were "mid-rise". The 24" waist was ridiculous for a size 12.
Leave a comment:
-
Probably explains why there are a lot of private sellers on eBay selling clothes which are BNWT (brand new with tags).Originally posted by cojak View PostYes it is I'm afraid. Buying clothes online is rubbish - this is why people send most stuff back (I can't be arsed).
If you have just one or two sites that send you stuff that fits you tend to stick to them.
Leave a comment:
-
YesOriginally posted by DealorNoDeal View Post(Not for me you understand
)
The OH bought 3 different pairs of jeans on-line, all size 12. I measured the waist with a tape measure and one was 33", one was 30" and one was even 24".
Is that par for the course?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48



Leave a comment: