• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Windows 95 launched 25 years ago today."

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    The clue is is in the name "Windows 95", Gricer. The rest is arithmetic.
    It's quite common for products not to be launched in the year they're named, though normally only an off-by-1 error. I assume it's due to zer0-indexing confusing the marketing folk.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Rearden Metal View Post
    Was it really that long ago?
    The clue is is in the name "Windows 95", Gricer. The rest is arithmetic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rearden Metal
    replied
    Was it really that long ago?

    That was launched with quite a fanfare - wasn't the Guardian free that day courtesy of dead eye Bill?

    Leave a comment:


  • NigelJK
    replied
    True UK Techies did OS1.2 -> CPN -> Arthur -> RiscOS

    If you wanted to run any of the inferior OS's you could on RiscOS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post
    I always thought MS Win OS's went on a theme:

    Divorced
    Beheaded
    Divorced
    Beheaded
    Divorced
    Disemboweled
    Divorced
    Beheaded
    Beheaded
    Survived

    qh
    You're welcome.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    GEM was quite fun.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    1. Originally posted by quackhandle View Post
      I always thought MS Win OS's went on a theme:
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post

    3.11 Okay
    95 pants
    98 SE Decent
    ME Crap
    XP Okay
    Vista awful
    7 Goodish
    8 Pants again
    8.1 Slightly less pants Start screen is back!
    10 Decent as long as you don't run updates until you have updated all the drivers and your laptop charger is plugged in.

    qh

    1-3.0 stayed up as long as NLyUK's pants.

    3.1 yes it lasts a day mostly.
    3.11 (Windows for Crashgroups) ok for a day or two if you don't push it or have odd drivers.
    95 - ME (Windows Multiple exceptions) = 3.11 ++

    2000 - yes that lasts a week before reboot for an ordinary user. Corporations loved it.
    XP fast more secure and lasted a week or two between reboots. Ditto
    Vista - skip.
    7 - what vista should have been.
    8 - too early, too far.
    8.1 - what 8 should have been.
    10 - properly managed normal user reboots once a month for updates.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post
    I always thought MS Win OS's went on a theme:

    3.11 Okay
    95 pants
    98 SE Decent
    ME Crap
    XP Okay
    Vista awful
    7 Goodish
    8 Pants again
    8.1 Slightly less pants Start screen is back!
    10 Decent as long as you don't run updates until you have updated all the drivers and your laptop charger is plugged in.

    qh
    7 and 10 for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    I always thought MS Win OS's went on a theme:

    3.11 Okay
    95 pants
    98 SE Decent
    ME Crap
    XP Okay
    Vista awful
    7 Goodish
    8 Pants again
    8.1 Slightly less pants Start screen is back!
    10 Decent as long as you don't run updates until you have updated all the drivers and your laptop charger is plugged in.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    PRAY4BR14
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by jainnode View Post
    FOLHH
    FOBR14

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    Yes, if my memory serves me correctly it relied on MVS as the core. There were other interesting snippets such as having to get the letters IBM into the BIOS without infringing patents etc. O' for the good old days.
    MVS - big endian, EBCDIC
    Intel - little endian
    OS/2 - ascii

    Leave a comment:


  • jainnode
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Bollocks...
    FOLHH

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    And then they installed CCTV in the server room to stop you spending your day wanking over second-hand dog porn. Clearing up afterwards is how PC got into "IT".
    Do you mean that the CCTV worked?

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by jainnode View Post
    it in turn, was based on MVS.
    ported to micros
    Yes, if my memory serves me correctly it relied on MVS as the core. There were other interesting snippets such as having to get the letters IBM into the BIOS without infringing patents etc. O' for the good old days.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X