• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Tories spending on adwords"

Collapse

  • NorthWestPerm2Contr
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Do click on their ad links!!!

    Every click costs them money...
    FTFY

    Leave a comment:


  • radish2008
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Could this be a Yes Minister Sir Humphrey type crafty ploy to announce some dire sounding policy, only to obtain kudos from relieved voters when a subsequent U-turn is announced withdrawing it? Seems possible, although it would rather spoil Theresa May's self-declared "strong and stable" image.

    Also, a common factor in these yoyo policy announcements and U-turns seems to be Philip Hammond. So doubtless he's for the chop after the election!
    She certainly didn't look strong and stable when Laura K asked her the question.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Don't click on their ad links!!!

    Every click costs them money...

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Also, a common factor in these yoyo policy announcements and U-turns seems to be Philip Hammond. So doubtless he's for the chop after the election!
    Fingers crossed. Can't stand the man, proper Tory Wet, Spitting Image would have had a field day with him.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by radish2008 View Post
    Reports of the expected U Turn coming in already ...
    Could this be a Yes Minister Sir Humphrey type crafty ploy to announce some dire sounding policy, only to obtain kudos from relieved voters when a subsequent U-turn is announced withdrawing it? Seems possible, although it would rather spoil Theresa May's self-declared "strong and stable" image.

    Also, a common factor in these yoyo policy announcements and U-turns seems to be Philip Hammond. So doubtless he's for the chop after the election!

    Leave a comment:


  • radish2008
    replied
    Reports of the expected U Turn coming in already ...

    Leave a comment:


  • radish2008
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    You haven't though. When has your taxes ever paid for social care - that's always been a means tested - charged for service from local authorities (going back at least 30 years)
    Ken Clarke in 1990 after a quick google. That doesn't make it right through does it ?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlasterBates
    replied
    Dilnot costed out. Capping the costs to a maximum of 35,000 would cost 1.7 billion

    [ARCHIVED CONTENT] UK Government Web Archive – The National Archives

    This could easily have been paid for if the government wasn't faced with a 100 billion pound bill to leave the EU.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    That was government spending. This is party spending.

    And for the avoidance of doubt: those cows are far away
    She introduced it as 'My Manifesto' are you sure she will understand the distinction?

    Maybe its under Fake News?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    But Dilcott had considered this and was coming out with a viable way to do it.

    This is the only area in life where you're on your own when it comes to arranging and paying for a major life-changing event.
    It's the people in the middle who will be squeezed which is where everyone is complaining.

    If you are very rich like the Duke of Westminister you will put everything in trust and avoid paying.

    If you are poor so have no assets the state has no choice but to pay.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    Remember the Brexit leaflet.
    That was government spending. This is party spending.

    And for the avoidance of doubt: those cows are far away

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    If you need care, you need to pay for it. So that means either a 5p or so on income tax or some other means of ensuring people have a means of paying..
    But Dilcott had considered this and was coming out with a viable way to do it.

    This is the only area in life where you're on your own when it comes to arranging and paying for a major life-changing event.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Don't forget to click on their promoted links - it costs US hard cash when you do that
    Remember the Brexit leaflet.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Don't forget to click on their promoted links - it costs them hard cash when you do that

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post
    You haven't though. When has your taxes ever paid for social care - that's always been a means tested - charged for service from local authorities (going back at least 30 years)
    shush its Savage Tory Cuts...

    The figures don't have to support that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X