Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Lorry kills nine at Christmas market"
UK (and Ireland) have access to SIS (Schengen Information System) I seem to rmemeber.....
Yes, but not to Article 96 data which is specifically relevant here.
1. Data relating to aliens who are reported for the purposes of being refused entry shall be included on the basis of a national report resulting from decisions taken, in compliance with the rules of procedure laid down by national legislation, by the administrative authorities or courts responsible.
2. Decisions may be based on a threat to public order or national security and safety which the presence of an alien in national territory may pose.
Such may in particular be the case with:
(a) an alien who has been convicted of an offence carrying a custodial sentence of at least one year;
(b) an alien who, there are serious grounds for believing, has committed serious offences, including those referred to in Article 71, or against whom there is genuine evidence of an intention to commit such offences in the territory of a Contracting Party.
3. Decisions may also be based on the fact that the alien has been the subject of a deportation, removal or expulsion measure which has not been rescinded or suspended, including or accompanied by a prohibition on entry or, where appropriate, residence, based on non-compliance with national regulations on the entry or residence of aliens.
RT? 50% chance of it being untrue. 99% chance of it being spun. And 100% chance of it being irrelevant, since the UK isn't part of the the intelligence sharing that is a component of Schengen.
Iceland and Malta are both island nations of Schengen.
The Swiss voted to join Schengen, largely because they were swayed be the security arguments of increased intelligence sharing.
UK (and Ireland) have access to SIS (Schengen Information System) I seem to rmemeber.....
This is the mail so must be wrong. All migrants will happily work real hard for minimum wage - we are continually being told this by remainers so must be true.
On the other hand that means there are now 1million jihadis with nothing to do sat slap bang in the middle of Europe.
Even if they abolished Schengen surely it would not be hard to get across most borders in the EU by avoiding official routes? Most don't have fences yet.
Yep.
There is some travel guy who is rolled out every time there is a travel incident and this is the point he makes every single time.
And while it's hard to go across mountains in winter it's not in summer.
Even if they abolished Schengen surely it would not be hard to get across most borders in the EU by avoiding official routes? Most don't have fences yet.
RT? 50% chance of it being untrue. 99% chance of it being spun. And 100% chance of it being irrelevant, since the UK isn't part of the the intelligence sharing that is a component of Schengen.
Iceland and Malta are both island nations of Schengen.
The Swiss voted to join Schengen, largely because they were swayed be the security arguments of increased intelligence sharing.
To be precise, what the German Federal Office for Migration and Refugees announced in August 2015 was that Syrian refugees would not be subject to the Dublin Regulation, meaning they would not be sent back to whichever EU country they had first arrived in.
That's cos she knew most of them were middle class. Only the uneducated and unskilled wanted to come to the UK.
I don't know. My point is that, contrary to popular opinion, Merkel didn't extend an open invitation to every refugee to come to Germany. It was the fact that Hungary couldn't cope that made Merkel say that Syrian refugees would be processed faster.
To be precise, what the German Federal Office for Migration and Refugees announced in August 2015 was that Syrian refugees would not be subject to the Dublin Regulation, meaning they would not be sent back to whichever EU country they had first arrived in.
Leave a comment: