• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Europe's highest court has ruled that time taken to travel to work should count as wo"

Collapse

  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Bangers aren't expensive to own especially if you are a mature person.
    They always have seemed expensive to run to us, and we're not earning £7/hour. On NMW, EVERYTHING is expensive - buying a new tyre or exhaust tube is a big deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    interesting if as a contractor you have a registered office in London but work in Manchester can you claim expenses from your employer > 2 years or if IR35 caught?

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    Unless you're talking about NLYUK, I think you mean employers.....
    indeed I was going to put it the other way round but it sounded like NLUK doing quality control!

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    So this isn't about paying people to travel to work as the thread title appears to shout and because we are leaving the EU we won't be able to get it

    It's about getting some form of recompense for those people who have no fixed office and have to travel between appointments and only get paid for time on those appoint meets.

    That makes sense of course.

    But not quite what the title implies no?
    its general!

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    So this isn't about paying people to travel to work as the thread title appears to shout and because we are leaving the EU we won't be able to get it

    It's about getting some form of recompense for those people who have no fixed office and have to travel between appointments and only get paid for time on those appoint meets.

    That makes sense of course.

    But not quite what the title implies no?

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    good news on the travel time. Many carers get shafted by their employees.
    Unless you're talking about NLYUK, I think you mean employers.....

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    why do people assume only the EU can moderate big business and control employment law.
    .
    In the UK ability has little to do with reality. Employers just evade the rules.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
    I thought you worked from your home office? It took you an hour to get to your clients which is a business trip no?
    The article says "without a fixed office", so anyone claiming their home is their fixed office won't be covered.

    Seems this is as much about minimum wage as anything else. A lot of carers especially are earning less than minimum wage when you take into account travelling time, and that's not right given that travelling around is an essential part of the job.

    Leave a comment:


  • Eirikur
    replied
    too bad for all these careworkers who travel in between patients and don't get paid for it. If only they had voted for remain

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Oh look it takes me 1 hour to get to work by car and two by bike - so regardless of what I do I'll say I travelled by bike - hey presto - more money.

    Quite the most stupid and ungovernable and unenforceable piece of legislation to come out of the festering boils of the European Court since the last one.

    I just can't even.
    So because one person may attempt to defraud their employer ( and not necessarily get away with it) we should do away with any attempt to protect the other 999?

    This isn't aimed at people working in conventional office jobs, it's aimed at mobile workers on or close to minimum wage, like Home Carers, Drivers etc. who don't have a fixed place of work and can be sent anywhere by their employers for their first and last jobs of the day and don't get paid for the time taken to get there or get home afterwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Oh look it takes me 1 hour to get to work by car and two by bike - so regardless of what I do I'll say I travelled by bike - hey presto - more money.

    Quite the most stupid and ungovernable and unenforceable piece of legislation to come out of the festering boils of the European Court since the last one.

    I just can't even.
    I think when the supervisor comes to visit the carers on site they might notice the lack of a bike?

    Remember they will be paying the extra money so having spent years screwing the carers over so they spend the most time travelling on their own dime to save the company 50p you think they are going to fall for that one?

    Just because someone can potentially with effort defraud it doesn't mean its a bad idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by original PM View Post
    Oh look it takes me 1 hour to get to work by car and two by bike - so regardless of what I do I'll say I travelled by bike - hey presto - more money.
    I thought you worked from your home office? It took you an hour to get to your clients which is a business trip no?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Oh look it takes me 1 hour to get to work by car and two by bike - so regardless of what I do I'll say I travelled by bike - hey presto - more money.

    Quite the most stupid and ungovernable and unenforceable piece of legislation to come out of the festering boils of the European Court since the last one.

    I just can't even.

    Leave a comment:


  • vetran
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Don't be so sarky,
    Ah Judge a civilisation by how it treats its prisoners, I assume that's what you are talking about otherwise it seems a little off topic.
    how do you think French, German & Spanish prisons look at the same time. The prisoners there are not been beaten or starved.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    +1. Now the establishment has been overthrown by a popular uprising, you can expect more and better employment rights, courtesy of Boris Johnson, Liam Fox, David Davies et al.
    Don't be so sarky,

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X