Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
So basically what thats saying is that, given sufficient resources, it's possible to game the Google predictive search results into appending a specific word or phrase to a search term. Now since it doesn't happen to the conservatives what does that say about who might be behind it?
There's more than some truth in the first suggestion. England sells the weapons, England invades other countries illegally to start war, England exports terrorists.
There's more than some truth in the first suggestion. England sells the weapons, England invades other countries illegally to start war, England exports terrorists.
So basically what thats saying is that, given sufficient resources, it's possible to game the Google predictive search results into appending a specific word or phrase to a search term. Now since it doesn't happen to the conservatives what does that say about who might be behind it?
It's from 2011 though so I'd have thought something like that would have been fixed by now.
What I think it means is that Google follows Dodgy Agent on twitter.
So basically what thats saying is that, given sufficient resources, it's possible to game the Google predictive search results into appending a specific word or phrase to a search term. Now since it doesn't happen to the conservatives what does that say about who might be behind it?
It's from 2011 though so I'd have thought something like that would have been fixed by now.
Leave a comment: