• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: IBM cutting rates

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "IBM cutting rates"

Collapse

  • b0redom
    replied
    Apparently not this time. I've just been given a release date. Budge up on the bench.

    Leave a comment:


  • BigTime
    replied
    They're only cutting the rates of the weak. Anyone who says no thanks will get extended at the same rate and told not to tell anyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by chef View Post
    So of the major service company players, by that I mean:

    IBM
    Cap Gemini
    Fujitsu
    Accenture
    Logica

    It feels like I've missed 1 out but hey ho, I'll update it if I think of it later.
    Atos
    Capita
    Siemens


    Leave a comment:


  • chef
    replied
    So of the major service company players, by that I mean:

    IBM
    Cap Gemini
    Fujitsu
    Accenture
    Logica

    It feels like I've missed 1 out but hey ho, I'll update it if I think of it later.

    My question is, in what order would you place them with top of the list being the worst to work for/with and thus the bottom of the list being the least worst to work for?

    Leave a comment:


  • quackhandle
    replied
    Oddly enough I have found out I am sitting next to some IBM recruiters (who engage contractors through Hays) and they have not heard anything about this rate cut.

    Asked them about IR35. They had never heard of it.

    qh

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by b0redom View Post
    Don't all contracts have this? MOO?
    Yes but it's normally there just to placate IR35, not to be used in anger... note your MOO clause is with your agent so it matters if the agent has a MOO clause with the client.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by kaiser78 View Post
    IBM are the worst service company I have ever had to engage with (yes, worse then Fuijitsu). Wouldn't even entertain a contract with these guys.
    Accidenture were worse Shirley?

    Leave a comment:


  • kaiser78
    replied
    IBM are the worst service company I have ever had to engage with (yes, worse then Fuijitsu). Wouldn't even entertain a contract with these guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    Don't all contracts have this? MOO?

    Leave a comment:


  • dmini
    replied
    Makes a change. Normally they just shove all the contractors onto 3 weeks furlough about this time of year. Or.... maybe they will do that as well. Believe it's written into the contracts these days

    Leave a comment:


  • BolshieBastard
    replied
    I always find it pays to not work for companies that always seem to head the rate cutting queue ie Barcrap, IBM and the like.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Originally posted by dogzilla View Post
    That's my take on it. Seems odd though, it must mean they pay people on hourly rates quite a tulip amount in comparison to those on daily rates.
    Different role.

    Leave a comment:


  • dogzilla
    replied
    Originally posted by doomage View Post
    2 different rate definitions. Daily rate != Hourly rate * number of hours. Different 'types' of contractors, usually daily raters earn more but the implication is that they might be expected to work longer but not charge any extra.
    That's my take on it. Seems odd though, it must mean they pay people on hourly rates quite a tulip amount in comparison to those on daily rates.

    Leave a comment:


  • doomage
    replied
    Originally posted by RasputinDude View Post
    How does that work then?
    2 different rate definitions. Daily rate != Hourly rate * number of hours. Different 'types' of contractors, usually daily raters earn more but the implication is that they might be expected to work longer but not charge any extra.

    Leave a comment:


  • RasputinDude
    replied
    £425 and an average hourly rate of £24.95.
    How does that work then?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X