Originally posted by PerfectStorm
View Post
I'm making the assumption that the agency wasn't always going to get 50% of his DR but they worked him over purely for their own advantage. That's not healthy for anyone in the contract (except the agency obviously) since the agency wasn't working on behalf of their client when they did that. Clients I've asked about this in the past would take a very dim view of that since in their eyes they want to be given the best bang for their buck not (potentially) the best 2/3rds of a bang for that buck.
All's fair in love and war, but the OP can kick back if he wants.
Leave a comment: