• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "State of the Market"

Collapse

  • oliverson
    replied
    So, hot off a banning for calling Reeves ‘Rachel from accounts’, deemed as ‘sexism’. Let’s leave it right there shall we?

    in my banned time I have some good news in the form of two offers, one of which I accepted and start Monday possibly. Possibly 2-3 years of work on this project I’m told. Outside IR35 and totally remote. Not the biggest rate I’ve had but the value of the project over time is significant.

    Sad to decline the other offer but whilst a higher rate and a more fulfilling project, the duration was short. Again outside IR35 and totally remote except an odd visit to the office once a month or so. On receiving my rejection the client was gutted so I’m told. Feel kind of bad on that but perhaps we can work something out later on. There may be an outside chance of servicing both contracts.

    just goes to show that dogged determination pays off in the end and the phrase ‘ when you’re going through hell, keep going’ rings very true.

    keep believing people!

    Leave a comment:


  • Fraidycat
    replied
    Originally posted by Bluenose View Post
    After a really good late September and the whole of October, November has reverted back to the average.

    I am not having problems securing work but many others are really struggling.
    And the promising spike up in the jobserve headline number is now back to what it was earlier this year.

    40 months, this IT jobs market recession has now turned in to a depression.

    With the perm market almost as bad as the contract market from what I can tell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bluenose
    replied
    After a really good late September and the whole of October, November has reverted back to the average.

    I am not having problems securing work but many others are really struggling.

    Leave a comment:


  • herman_g
    replied
    Originally posted by willendure View Post

    Yep. In some sense the really big players look Micrsoft or Google know there will be a crash, but also know they will survive. So competing hard in AI could be a way for them to kill off the competition in the longer term.

    Sold all AI stocks I own. Also sold all my bitcoin just as the current downtrend was getting started. Gold miners is where its at for me currently. $$
    I'm just a day trader. Still buying and selling stocks that have incorporated AI into their name as the general investment community has no clue about tech. My favourite was an American company that made tennis balls one day and woke up the next day as an AI firm. Stock went straight up and straight down. I manage a 40% gain.

    That said, even the best AI firms have no future without huge advancements in power generation.

    Leave a comment:


  • willendure
    replied
    Originally posted by herman_g View Post

    AI will have the exact same crash as the dot.com boom. Hard to figure out which one will be bigger.

    During the 1999 dot.com boom, any penny stock company that sent out runours of internet involvement went from nothing to gold and then later nothing.

    Now, they just stick AI on the back of their name and the stock soars.

    A single NVIDIA partner data center (under construction) was shown to need as much electricity to power it as it takes to power NYC, That power does not exist in the USA. Yet, they just keep building those data centers.

    The AI revolution is going nowhere. Yet, for now, those AI companies are being pumped with cash with few investors considering the upcoming crash.
    Yep. In some sense the really big players look Micrsoft or Google know there will be a crash, but also know they will survive. So competing hard in AI could be a way for them to kill off the competition in the longer term.

    Sold all AI stocks I own. Also sold all my bitcoin just as the current downtrend was getting started. Gold miners is where its at for me currently. $$

    Leave a comment:


  • herman_g
    replied
    Originally posted by edison View Post

    When someone like him that warns he's really worried about irrational AI investment levels then it's really time to start to worry.

    It feels like 1999 again...
    AI will have the exact same crash as the dot.com boom. Hard to figure out which one will be bigger.

    During the 1999 dot.com boom, any penny stock company that sent out runours of internet involvement went from nothing to gold and then later nothing.

    Now, they just stick AI on the back of their name and the stock soars.

    A single NVIDIA partner data center (under construction) was shown to need as much electricity to power it as it takes to power NYC, That power does not exist in the USA. Yet, they just keep building those data centers.

    The AI revolution is going nowhere. Yet, for now, those AI companies are being pumped with cash with few investors considering the upcoming crash.
    Last edited by herman_g; Today, 06:09.

    Leave a comment:


  • The_Equalizer
    replied
    Originally posted by edison View Post
    It feels like 1999 again...
    Although in 1999 there were a vast number of roles. Can't quite imagine what a bust in the current market would look like.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by SchumiStars View Post

    Not the ones from India/off-shore. They normally have a queue of people wanting to work for peanuts and a visa in my experience.


    My last city gig was at a European bank. The development floor was at least 80% Indian they were either extremely careful with their money or were getting paid way less than (at least what used used to be) the going rate.

    There were exceptions but in general they were lower calibre developers than I was used to working with. I don't blame them for chasing opportunity but if and when they are made redundant some will really struggle.
    Last edited by TheDude; Yesterday, 11:10.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheDude
    replied
    Originally posted by fatJock View Post

    But haven't consultancies historically backfilled with contractors?
    I guess - I am working for the government via a consultancy and a supplier. The rate is crap presumably because everyone in the supply chain is taking a chunk.

    I have had zero contact with the consultancy since starting in September.

    I'm not complaining because at least I am getting paid and it is outside but I am on £200 a day less that I was getting in 2013.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjt
    replied
    Originally posted by fatJock View Post

    But haven't consultancies historically backfilled with contractors?
    Thats where I seem to be getting work these days. Some of the small consultancies are almost like agencies in disguise. They pitch for work and when they win they have a pool of contractors they can utalise. I have to say its worth getting some contacts with these guys if they like you they can be a good source of work.

    Leave a comment:


  • pjt
    replied
    Originally posted by edison View Post

    Interesting point. Are there fewer people in their early to mid-30s, continuing to go into contracting?

    10-15 years ago it seemed that I worked with a lot of contractors who were under 35. Now there seem to be fewer younger ones about.

    This forum seems to be disproportionately populated by people well past 40 so I don't think we're particularly representative of 'the market'.
    Funnily enough my son has just picked up his first contract role. Hes still at Uni but has ben offered a part time gig with a small startup. Outside IR35 so their is some hope for the younger ones. I've given him a strong warning not to go down this road when he graduates though as its looking like a tough sell longer term.

    Leave a comment:


  • edison
    replied
    Originally posted by SchumiStars View Post

    So now we have even more competition from the consultancies and new contractors.

    Hence why there is fewer jobs, contracts and more people available. And this of course causes the rates to drop. A horrible cycle.

    This will only end when demand out strips supply. We need a tech revolution, a market distributor or something that will require enterprises to force a massive tech change.

    AI clearly isn't the tech revolution that was anticipated, at least in terms of job creation, contract opportunities etc.

    Almost every day now there is a warning about the insane level of capex investment going into AI infrastructure and tech stock market valuations.

    Google's CEO warned yesterday about the irrational AI investment boom following on from notable warnings from the Bank of England and JP Morgan's CEO.

    The one that really worried me was the CEO of Klarna who has been one of the biggest AI proponents. He fired 700 customer service staff and replaced them with AI bots which ended up being a disaster so they had to hire staff again.

    When someone like him that warns he's really worried about irrational AI investment levels then it's really time to start to worry.

    It feels like 1999 again...

    Leave a comment:


  • edison
    replied
    Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Post

    Problem is if the eco-system of contracting gets dismantled it will reach a point, or indeed might have already, where there is a terminal decline and it can't scale back up if the market improves and can't be a sizeable industry again.
    Interesting point. Are there fewer people in their early to mid-30s, continuing to go into contracting?

    10-15 years ago it seemed that I worked with a lot of contractors who were under 35. Now there seem to be fewer younger ones about.

    This forum seems to be disproportionately populated by people well past 40 so I don't think we're particularly representative of 'the market'.

    Leave a comment:


  • SchumiStars
    replied
    Originally posted by fatJock View Post

    But haven't consultancies historically backfilled with contractors?
    Not the ones from India/off-shore. They normally have a queue of people wanting to work for peanuts and a visa in my experience.

    The only problem with that is, when they get their visas they become a contractor. So now we have even more competition from the consultancies and new contractors.

    Hence why there is fewer jobs, contracts and more people available. And this of course causes the rates to drop. A horrible cycle.

    This will only end when demand out strips supply. We need a tech revolution, a market distributor or something that will require enterprises to force a massive tech change.


    Leave a comment:


  • fatJock
    replied
    Originally posted by SchumiStars View Post
    Talked to him about why the banks were not hiring and it seems they can avoid hiring contractors (IR35) by just outsourcing the work to consultancies on the same rate but outside IR35.
    But haven't consultancies historically backfilled with contractors?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X