• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Opening a new Ltd Co less than 2 years after MVL (but NOT claiming ER)"

Collapse

  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by eek View Post

    I find it useful to read the people who know about such things - say a person who has been doing MVLs for years such as

    Correct indeed:

    Condition C: at any time within the period of two years beginning with the date on which the distribution is made: yada yada yada

    So that's good news. Only 22 months left before I can go contracting again, outside IR35 of course.

    Got a call about an inside IR35 role, 450 Euros/day! Remote/home working, but still at that rate it works out worse than my permie job by some way.

    Leave a comment:


  • eek
    replied
    Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post

    Doesn't the 2 year timeframe start from when the business is formally dissolved? So this would be several months after the distributions.
    I find it useful to read the people who know about such things - say a person who has been doing MVLs for years such as

    Originally posted by Maslins View Post

    I think both. Ie if you were to start a new business >2 years from the first distribution but <2 years from the final one, then the first distribution would be safe, final one at risk.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Originally posted by luxCon View Post

    Does the 2 years start from the first or the final distribution?
    Doesn't the 2 year timeframe start from when the business is formally dissolved? So this would be several months after the distributions.

    Leave a comment:


  • DAR2008
    replied
    Perhaps your new Ltd company could have a line in floristry?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by abbyw View Post




    I'm so sorry if I'm being dumb, but I still don't understand taking both distributions into account for the 2-year count.

    I got my first distribution on June 2020. Second (and final) distribution was on Dec 2020. When is it safe to open a new Ltd Company?
    December 2022.

    Leave a comment:


  • abbyw
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

    Each distribution separately.
    Originally posted by Maslins View Post

    I think both. Ie if you were to start a new business >2 years from the first distribution but <2 years from the final one, then the first distribution would be safe, final one at risk.

    I'm so sorry if I'm being dumb, but I still don't understand taking both distributions into account for the 2-year count.

    I got my first distribution on June 2020. Second (and final) distribution was on Dec 2020. When is it safe to open a new Ltd Company?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by luxCon View Post

    Does the 2 years start from the first or the final distribution?
    Each distribution separately.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maslins
    replied
    Originally posted by luxCon View Post
    Does the 2 years start from the first or the final distribution?
    I think both. Ie if you were to start a new business >2 years from the first distribution but <2 years from the final one, then the first distribution would be safe, final one at risk.

    Leave a comment:


  • luxCon
    replied
    Originally posted by Maslins View Post
    I'd agree with many of the points above. Ie:
    .....
    .....
    - I believe the 2 years would run from the distribution dates, as those are the relevant dates from a personal tax perspective.
    Does the 2 years start from the first or the final distribution?

    Leave a comment:


  • Maslins
    replied
    I'd agree with many of the points above. Ie:
    - if you're caught, ER (or BADR as it's now known) is irrelevant, the liquidation distributions would be taxed on you as dividends, they wouldn't be capital gains at all.
    - whilst the 2 years is written into the rules, the other factors suggest this is a guide. If you were to start a new similar business within months, then it seems hard to argue you didn't have a reasonable idea that might happen when triggering the liquidation. If it were (say) 23 months later, I think you'd have a reasonable argument even though falling just short of the 2 years (though if in that situation if at all possible I'd recommend holding off another month to be more confident you're safe).
    - I believe the 2 years would run from the distribution dates, as those are the relevant dates from a personal tax perspective.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    TBH, though, your situation would come across as a little bit shammy. Your last distribution was only a few months ago. I think you'll have to suck it up and go umbrella and perhaps you've learned a lesson. Don't MVL your company unless you are really very certain about not returning any time soon. There will be a lot of examples like this as people wet themselves over the IR35 reforms (rightly or wrongly).

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Condition C of the TAAR concerns carrying on the same or a similar trade or activity within two years of a capital distribution, so if you had two distributions, there will be a separate date for each one.

    There is a school of thought that says the two-year rule has less than a literal interpretation. For example, if you've held a permie position that wasn't a sham to get around the TAAR, then there's a school of thought that says you could start a new company within 2 years. However, here be dragons IMHO, so you should get specialist advice and, even then, it's a risk.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by abbyw View Post
    Just to double-check, WHEN are the 2 years for TAAR counted from? When the declaration of solvency is filed? On final distribution? Help clarifying this please.
    I would be when you declared would it not? Payment can happen anytime. Same as it is for dividends no?

    Leave a comment:


  • abbyw
    replied
    Just to double-check, WHEN are the 2 years for TAAR counted from? When the declaration of solvency is filed? On final distribution? Help clarifying this please.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by abbyw View Post

    Ah so if I declare them as dividend income, it will be taxed as such.
    No it's free cash, tax free.......
    /sarcasm

    Of course it will be taxed as dividend.....



    Originally posted by abbyw View Post
    I haven't done calculations but I assume I would be a lot worse off tax-wise when it's a dividend.
    No idea till you do the calculations....

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X