• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Another high profile IR35 loss for HMRC"

Collapse

  • Lance
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post

    May as well save on the IR35 insurance and instead donate to those few unfortunate souls that get targeted each year, to cover their bill.
    What you describe there is insurance. Just a mutual one.

    Leave a comment:


  • PerfectStorm
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    WTAF! If I'm understanding that right, HMRC have only ever taken a handful of cases to court each year, and lost most of them.

    So those of us that in the early days of IR35 thought of it as a voluntary tax, in that the risk of investigation was low, have been proven right.*

    May as well save on the IR35 insurance and instead donate to those few unfortunate souls that get targeted each year, to cover their bill.

    HMRC are relying on the threat rather than the reality of prosecution to frighten people into paying the IR35 tax. No wonder they don't understand their own legislation, they don't need to.

    Since inception how much has HMRC received from IR35 and how much has it cost?

    *I suppose there may be a large number of investigations that didn't get to court as the dues were paid.
    Is there a bit of confirmation bias going on here?

    Those cases that go to court, are the the ones the punter expects to win. Otherwise their IPSE/QDOS/legal advisor/themselves advises them to fold and pay the extra.

    So HMRC 'wins' every case of an individual paying back at PAYE rates, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • Maslins
    replied
    Wowsers! Does partly make you think "congrats", and partly "lower your prices then"!

    Leave a comment:


  • pr1
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    True, but may as well cut out the middleman who may be making lots of profit on this.
    Qdos Group Posts 51% Margin, Plus GBP7.1m Profits for 2017 – Insurance Edge

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Originally posted by SuperLooper View Post
    That's pretty much exactly what insurance is.
    True, but may as well cut out the middleman who may be making lots of profit on this.

    Leave a comment:


  • SuperLooper
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    May as well save on the IR35 insurance and instead donate to those few unfortunate souls that get targeted each year, to cover their bill.
    That's pretty much exactly what insurance is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maslins
    replied
    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    May as well save on the IR35 insurance and instead donate to those few unfortunate souls that get targeted each year, to cover their bill.
    Hehe, a nice theory...but if you're the unlucky one who got "caught", can you rely on other contractors to bail you out?!

    Originally posted by Hobosapien View Post
    HMRC are relying on the threat rather than the reality of prosecution to frighten people into paying the IR35 tax. No wonder they don't understand their own legislation, they don't need to.

    Since inception how much has HMRC received from IR35 and how much has it cost?

    *I suppose there may be a large number of investigations that didn't get to court as the dues were paid.
    As well as your * point, I think one key reason IR35 was retained was the extra tax incurred simply by fear of it existing. Ie there was an argument that if they publicly scrapped it, the floodgates would open with a few million more PAYE employees becoming Ltd Co contractors.

    I think it's becoming increasingly common that many laws are as good as unenforceable. As long as the majority of people are still scared of them, those laws still serve a useful purpose. It's when the masses realise many laws are unenforceable and no longer fear them that we have anarchy!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    WTAF! If I'm understanding that right, HMRC have only ever taken a handful of cases to court each year, and lost most of them.

    So those of us that in the early days of IR35 thought of it as a voluntary tax, in that the risk of investigation was low, have been proven right.*

    May as well save on the IR35 insurance and instead donate to those few unfortunate souls that get targeted each year, to cover their bill.

    HMRC are relying on the threat rather than the reality of prosecution to frighten people into paying the IR35 tax. No wonder they don't understand their own legislation, they don't need to.

    Since inception how much has HMRC received from IR35 and how much has it cost?

    *I suppose there may be a large number of investigations that didn't get to court as the dues were paid.
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 25 May 2019, 11:09.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alchemy Accountancy
    replied
    Originally posted by DeludedKitten View Post
    Anyone got the stats on high profile HMRC wins this year? Would be useful for when I talk to my MP about it. By my reckoning they are either 2 wins from 6 cases or 2 from 7 in 2019 but I may have miscounted.
    NLUK has already mentioned the site, but there is a good table here:

    3 Aug 2001 12 Sep 2001 Battersby v Campbell HMRC
    01 Dec 2001 22 Jan 2002 F S Consulting Limited vs McCaul HMRC
    01 Oct 2002 01 Oct 2002 Lime IT vs Justin Contractor
    27 Feb 2003 28 Mar 2003 Synaptek vs Young HMRC
    15 Aug 2003 03 Nov 2003 Tilbury v HMIT Contractor
    01 Jan 2004 08 Oct 2004 Usetech vs Young (inc High Court) HMRC
    01 Mar 2004 29 Jul 2004 Ansell Computer Services Contractor
    23 Mar 2004 22 Oct 2004 Future Online (inc High Court) HMRC
    15 Dec 2004 17 Jan 2005 Netherlane Limited HMRC
    28 Jun 2007 05 Jul 2007 Island Consultants Ltd V Revenue & Customs HMRC
    23 Jul 2007 20 Dec 2007 Datagate Services Ltd Contractor
    20 Sep 2007 11 Dec 2007 Dragonfly Consulting Ltd HMRC
    26 Sep 2007 11 Dec 2007 MKM Computing Ltd HMRC
    01 Nov 2007 11 Dec 2007 First Word Software Ltd Contractor
    22 Jan 2008 19 May 2008 Alternative Book Company Ltd HMRC
    24 Nov 2008 15 Jan 2009 Larkstar Data HMRC
    08 Dec 2009 06 Apr 2010 Novasoft Contractor
    15 Nov 2010 05 Jan 2011 MBF Design Services v HMRC Contractor
    10 Jan 2011 24 Jun 2011 Marlen Ltd Contractor
    17 Feb 2011 11 May 2011 ECR Consulting Contractor
    12 Apr 2011 06 Jul 2011 Primary Path Ltd Contractor
    24 Oct 2011 28 Nov 2011 JLJ Services v HMRC Split case
    15 Nov 2016 27 Jan 2017 Armitage Technical Design Services Limited Contractor
    26 Sep 2017 14 Feb 2018 Christa Ackroyd HMRC
    04 Oct 2017 16 May 2018 Jensal Software Limited Contractor
    08 Nov 2017 19 Mar 2018 MDCM Ltd Contractor
    12 Nov 2018 20 Mar 2019 Albatel Limited (Lorraine Kelly) Contractor
    11 Mar 2019 16 Apr 2019 Atholl Limited Contractor
    Last edited by Contractor UK; 25 May 2019, 11:11.

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by simes View Post
    Many thanks. All cleared.
    I see it as a fresh start

    Leave a comment:


  • simes
    replied
    Originally posted by simes View Post
    Mods, not sure what Reputation Comments are, nor how they are used, and nor how they are cleaned up - but if you could be so kind...
    Many thanks. All cleared.

    Leave a comment:


  • DeludedKitten
    replied
    Originally posted by DeludedKitten View Post
    Anyone got the stats on high profile HMRC wins this year? Would be useful for when I talk to my MP about it. By my reckoning they are either 2 wins from 6 cases or 2 from 7 in 2019 but I may have miscounted.
    IPSE press release says since the public sector rollout in 2017 HMRC have now lost five out of six cases.

    Aren't they only meant to proceed if there is a good chance of winning??

    Leave a comment:


  • Hobosapien
    replied
    Would those type of stats be obtainable from HMRC via a freedom of information request? If so, anyone already seen the result of such a request?

    Publication scheme - HM Revenue & Customs - GOV.UK

    Leave a comment:


  • northernladuk
    replied
    Originally posted by DeludedKitten View Post
    Anyone got the stats on high profile HMRC wins this year? Would be useful for when I talk to my MP about it. By my reckoning they are either 2 wins from 6 cases or 2 from 7 in 2019 but I may have miscounted.
    You could try dropping Dave Chaplin at Contractor Calculator. He's been all over these cases on LinkedIn for a long time now so sure he's got a good idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • DeludedKitten
    replied
    Anyone got the stats on high profile HMRC wins this year? Would be useful for when I talk to my MP about it. By my reckoning they are either 2 wins from 6 cases or 2 from 7 in 2019 but I may have miscounted.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X