• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

test please delete

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #id
    I wonder how long it'd take to read this thread from start to finish
    ǝןqqıʍ

    Comment


      #id
      In June 1947 the military requirements were updated and the Model 464-17 met all of them except for the range. It was becoming obvious to the Air Force that, even with the updated performance, the XB-52 would be obsolete by the time it entered production and would offer little improvement over the Convair B-36.[6] As the result, the entire project was put on hold for six months.
      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

      Comment


        #id
        Faqqer's still not there, but DS23 is lurking
        ǝןqqıʍ

        Comment


          #id
          We're so close
          ǝןqqıʍ

          Comment


            #id
            Oh flip it.... GO
            How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

            Comment


              #id
              23000!!!!
              ǝןqqıʍ

              Comment


                #id
                Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
                I wonder how long it'd take to read this thread from start to finish
                7 hours 59 minutes and 3.75 seconds.
                Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.

                Xenophon said: "CUK Geek of the Week". A gingerjedi certified "Elitist Tw@t". Posting rated @ 5 lard points

                Comment


                  #id
                  During this time, Boeing continued to perfect the design which resulted in the Model 464-29 with a top speed of 455 miles per hour (395 kn, 730 km/h) and a 5,000-mile range.[6] In September 1947, the Heavy Bombardment Committee was convened to ascertain performance requirements for a nuclear bomber. Formalized on 8 December 1947, these called for a top speed of 500 miles per hour (440 kn, 800 km/h) and an 8,000 statute mile (7,000 nmi, 13,000 km) range, far beyond the capabilities of 464-29.[10]
                  How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                  Comment


                    #id
                    Originally posted by Troll View Post
                    Oh flip it.... GO
                    Thanks
                    ǝןqqıʍ

                    Comment


                      #id
                      Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
                      23000!!!!
                      I had 4 screens loaded up...couldn't be bothered anymore
                      How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X