Brushing up on AngularJS. It's constructed on principles that are fundamentally wrong and misguided, but it seems to be the new hotness that all the prospective clients believe, mistakenly, they must have
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostBrushing up on AngularJS. It's constructed on principles that are fundamentally wrong and misguided, but it seems to be the new hotness that all the prospective clients believe, mistakenly, they must havemerely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by zeitghost View PostMy pimpmail (which I can't be arsed to post in my famous Doh! thread) was from the inevitable R*ch*rd J*yce.
It was for someone with design experience of aluminium castings.
I did work for BT once, 8 years ago, doing ISO27000 audits.
"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostI'm glad its not just me thinking that. I've looked at Angular Backbone and Ember over the years and the only 1 I like is Ember...
As far as I can see, the only advantage any of these things offer over just writing straightforward JS, probably with the addition of jQuery, is some fantasy of maintainability and ongoing improvement/enhancement, which never happens because after a couple of years nobody is using the framework any more, and everything just gets thrown away and rewritten with whatever's next.
I suppose they can have some value for knocking out fairly straightforward line-of-business apps to run inside the corporate firewall, but that's about it.Comment
-
test please delete
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostI haven't had a play with Ember yet - must add it to the list. I've done a bit with Backbone previously, but I think that has some fairly fundamental flaws too. I did a bunch of stuff with Knockout last year. It's another one where you're supposed to clutter your markup with attributes, then end up having to write a load of custom code anyway to do anything beyond the absolute basics.
As far as I can see, the only advantage any of these things offer over just writing straightforward JS, probably with the addition of jQuery, is some fantasy of maintainability and ongoing improvement/enhancement, which never happens because after a couple of years nobody is using the framework any more, and everything just gets thrown away and rewritten with whatever's next.
I suppose they can have some value for knocking out fairly straightforward line-of-business apps to run inside the corporate firewall, but that's about it.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostI doubt any of them will last the distance. The only thing I've seen in the JavaScript world that impressed me recently is react which is great if you want to render stuff fast and seamlessly but a pain to code as it merges the view back into the model
It all reminds me of the situation about seven or eight years ago, when massive flamewars erupted over the putative benefits of Dojo, Prototype, et al. The only survivor of all that was jQuery, for the fairly straightforward reason that it did just enough to ease the pain of browser compatibility without forcing you into some stupid application architecture that appeared to have been invented by somebody who'd made it through about two-thirds of the GoF book and had missed the point of it entirely.
Nowadays, I'm tempted to ditch even jQuery and feature-detect support for stuff like querySelector and CSS transitions/animations, with older browsers just getting plain old HTML and CSS - Progressive Enhancement FTW!Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Alias View Postmaven is a awful tbhComment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostI've heard a lot about it, all of it bad
Trouble is when it doesn't you are wading through treacle trying to find the problem and that ends up being a lot of the time because someone changed something...Last edited by eek; 26 August 2014, 21:24.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
I wish I knew & understood wtf you guys are on about.
On 2nd thoughts, I really don't care any more.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment