I had some conversations with relevant people tonight. There is a feint, and I mean feint, glimmer that something good could be around the corner. And yes they have seen the online model.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Results of the public sector consultation is up
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by seeourbee View PostIt's sad to hear that as I think it illustrates you don't get the business model we work on. Just like HMT and BIES, the so called "champions" of small businesses.Comment
-
Originally posted by Lance View Posteven if they do roll them out to the private sector, it will only make a difference if the clients choose to make their contractors inside. If they want SDC over a contractor then they'll do it as inside. And in that matter it might have the effect of making IR35 enforceable as desired.
But if they don't want SDC, then why would they volunteer to pay NICS?
I can see it making a difference in the private sector but only to permitractors who are skating on thin ice anyway.
Oh, and it's only 20% or so, ... and that is likely to be shared between client, squeezed agency margin, lower rate for the contractor, ... and the contractor can quit complaining about SDC and fall in to line (as HR would see it), ... and they get their temporary resource without the overhead of employment rights.
Its speculation at this stage, but when this comes for the private sector expect there to be no downside to a risk averse client/agent (other than a little extra tax) for assessing a contract inside IR35.Last edited by Contreras; 9 December 2016, 07:02.Comment
-
Originally posted by coolhandluke View PostI'm currently working on a public sector gig that ends 31st March with final invoices to be paid after April.
// Baleted
Spoke to one other contractor here about the change and he states it won't impact him as he carries his own phone to meetings....
However, when the worse case scenario is paying tax on your £400 a day rate, life isn't that bad to be honest.Comment
-
Results of the public sector consultation is up
I may have missed the discussion but doesn't the legislation say MSCs are outside of these new rules. Para 48. So PS body pays Agency who in turn pay A Ltd, an MSC, who then pay another company B Ltd who is a PSC ?Last edited by seeourbee; 9 December 2016, 13:51.Comment
-
Originally posted by rocktronAMP View PostSupposing you have a four weeks notice in this PS sector, if I were you, I'd resign on the exact date of Friday 24th February 2016 with the letter signed, sealed and personally delivered to the line manager. Give yourself a one week holiday / grace, because if your payment crosses that starting line on the 6th April 2017 or afterwards, then you've had it.
Delivering a resignation letter to your line manager?
Are you an employee or a Contractor?
FFS.Comment
-
Originally posted by seeourbee View PostI had some conversations with relevant people tonight. There is a feint, and I mean feint, glimmer that something good could be around the corner. And yes they have seen the online model.Comment
-
Originally posted by seeourbee View PostI may have missed the discussion but doesn't the legislation say MSCs are outside of these new rules. Para 48. So PS body pays Agency who in turn pay A Ltd, an MSC, who then pay another company B Ltd who is a PSC ?
And long daisy chains of improbable arrangements are totally pointless, since the Ramsay principle means HMRC can simply ignore any unnecessary intermediaries and look at the net result.Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
So what about the instances where a PS pays a consultancy who have a load of contractors operating through PSCs ? I had forgotten the rules about MSCsComment
-
Originally posted by seeourbee View PostSo what about the instances where a PS pays a consultancy who have a load of contractors operating through PSCs ? I had forgotten the rules about MSCs
How that will work in anyone's guess, but the only sensible conclusion is a consultancy feeding a PS client will ensure that all its people are salaried, be they employees, FTC victims or PSCs.
We should be focussing on what we do about it, not crafty schemes to get out of it. They won't work and will only result in more draconian measures.Blog? What blog...?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Yesterday 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Yesterday 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
Comment