Originally posted by creativity
View Post
In a previous life I dealt with a very large contractor group for a well known bank. Most of those guys were required to travel to branches, admin centres, etc. We had a massive barney with HMRC over what expenses the bank could reimburse to such peripatetic workers.
In the end we agreed that each worker would have a nominal place of work. Let's say that was 20 road miles from their home. The first 40 miles a day of travel would be regarded as "home to office" travel and if reimbursed, was taxable on the worker. (In fact the bank picked up the cost). Thus a worker going from home to a work place other than the "nominal" but actually closer, may not get any tax deductible expenses. Equally somebody who did a 3 or 6 month assignment that required a 100 mile round trip a day would get relief on 60 miles worth.
The bank and the contractors had to keep meticulous records and these were audited with some rigour by HMRC.
I'll be interested to see what approach HMRC take with retrospective claims which are in most cases going to be broad estimates.
Comment